Observational studyThe oncologist2019
Lenalidomide in Pretreated Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: An Italian Observational Multicenter Retrospective Study in Daily Clinical Practice.
Observational study in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Agents contributing to secondary immunodeficiency development in patients with multiple myeloma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A systematic literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Monotherapy for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Bendamustine plus rituximab in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Annals of hematology · 2022Trial
- Sequencing Anti-CD19 Therapies in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: From Mechanistic Insights to Clinical Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Real life clinical outcomes of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: The STRIDER study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- RE-MIND: Comparing Tafasitamab + Lenalidomide (L-MIND) with a Real-world Lenalidomide Monotherapy Cohort in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Article
- Real-World, Single-Center Data for Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Transformed Follicular Lymphoma.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype, and approximately 50% of the patients are >60 years of age. Patients with relapsed/refractory (rr) disease have a poor prognosis with currently available treatments. Lenalidomide is available in Italy for patients with rrDLBCL based on a local disposition of the Italian Drug Agency. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND
methodsAn observational retrospective study was conducted in 24 Italian hematology centers with the aim to improve information on effectiveness and safety of lenalidomide use for rrDLBCL in real practice.
resultsOne hundred fifty-three patients received lenalidomide for 21/28 days with a median of four cycles. At the end of therapy, there were 36 complete responses (23.5%) and 9 partial responses with an overall response rate (ORR) of 29.4%. In the elderly (>65 years) subset, the ORR was 33.6%. With a median follow-up of 36 months, median overall survival was reached at 12 months and median disease-free survival was not reached at 62 months. At the latest available follow-up, 29 patients are still in response out of therapy. Median progression-free survivals differ significantly according to age (2.5 months vs. 9.5 in the younger vs. elderly group, respectively) and to disease status at the latest previous therapy (15 months for relapsed patients vs. 3.5 for refractory subjects). Toxicities were manageable, even if 30 of them led to an early drug discontinuation.
conclusionLenalidomide therapy for patients with rrDLBCL is effective and tolerable even in a real-life context, especially for elderly patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and approximately 50% of the patients are >60 years of age. Patients with relapsed/refractory (rr) disease have a poor prognosis, reflected by the remarkably short life expectancy of 12 months with currently available treatments. The rrDLBCL therapeutic algorithm is not so well established because data in the everyday clinical practice are still poor. Lenalidomide for patients with rrDLBCL is effective and tolerable even in a real-life context, especially for elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.