Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30940269›Full record

ArticleThe Behavioral and brain sciences2019

Taking an engineer's view: Implications of network analysis for computational psychiatry.

A David Redish, Rebecca Kazinka, Alexander B Herman

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Computational validity: using computation to translate behaviours across species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A David RedishDepartment of Neuroscience,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN 55455.redish@umn.edu.
Rebecca KazinkaDepartment of Psychology,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN 55455.kazin003@umn.edu.
Alexander B HermanDepartment of Psychiatry,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN 55455.herma686@umn.edu.

Funding

Using Computation to Achieve Breakthroughs in NeuroscienceT32MH115886 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH115886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An engineer's viewpoint on psychiatry asks: What are the failure modes that underlie psychiatric dysfunction? And: How can we modify the system? Psychiatry has made great strides in understanding and treating disorders using biology; however, failure modes and modification access points can also exist extrinsically in environmental interactions. The network analysis suggested by Borsboom et al. in the target article provides a new viewpoint that should be incorporated into current theoretical constructs, not placed in opposition to them.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesPsychiatryHumansPsychopathologyResearch

Identifiers

PMID30940269
PMCPMC7006221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.