Trial reportCancer communications (London, England)2019
Irinotecan plus S-1 versus S-1 in patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer (ESWN 01): a prospective randomized, multicenter, open-labeled phase 3 trial.
Trial report in Cancer communications (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02319187 (Irinotecan Plus S1 Versus S1 in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Irinotecan Plus S1 Versus S1 in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESWN 01 Trial): a Phase 3, Prospective,Multicenter, Randomised Study
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab in Second-Line Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Literature Review and Simulated Treatment Comparisons.Advances in therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- A Phase II Study of Apatinib in Patients with Chemotherapy-Refractory Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESO-Shanghai 11).The oncologist · 2021Trial
- Development of a multi-epitope mRNA vaccine targeting tumor-associated antigens for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Second-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge in Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- A predictive model for advanced esophageal cancer involving the lower third of the esophagus.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Efficacy and toxicity of anlotinib plus camrelizumab versus anlotinib plus S-1 as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A real-world retrospective study.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2024Article
- Transarterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer with airway stenosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Organoid models combined with genome engineering and epigenome studies to define SOX2 function evolution in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Thoracic cancer · 2021Article
- Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2021Article
- [Clinical efficacy of anlotinib plus S-1 as a second-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2021Article
- Current Topics in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2020Article
- Preoperative squamous cell carcinoma antigen and albumin serum levels predict the survival of patients with stage T1-3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective observational study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2020Observational
- Clinical efficacy of irinotecan plus raltitrexed chemotherapy in refractory esophageal squamous cell cancer.Anti-cancer drugs · 2020Article
- Association Between Multiple Lines of Active Therapy and Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
- Article
- Efficacy of irinotecan-based chemotherapy after exposure to an anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe benefit of systemic treatments in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) which has progressed after chemotherapy is still uncertain and optimal regimens based on randomized trials have not yet been established. We aimed to compare the efficacy of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 monotherapy in recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients who had resistance to platinum- or taxane-based chemotherapy.
methodsWe conducted a prospective randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial in 15 centers across China. Eligible patients were adults with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic ESCC, and were randomly assigned (ratio, 1:1) to receive either irinotecan plus S-1 (intravenous infusion of irinotecan [160 mg/m
resultsBetween December 23, 2014 and July 25, 2016, we screened 148 patients and randomly assigned 123 patients to receive either irinotecan plus S-1 regimen (n = 61) or S-1 monotherapy (n = 62). After a median follow-up of 29.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.5-40.9 months), the median PFS was significantly longer in the irinotecan plus S-1 group than in the S-1 monotherapy group (3.8 months [95% CI 2.9-4.3 months] vs. 1.7 months [95% CI 1.4-2.7 months], hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.86, P = 0.006). The objective response rates were 24.6% in the irinotecan plus S-1 group and 9.7% in the S-1 monotherapy group (P = 0.002). The patients in the irinotecan plus S-1 group presented with increased rates of grade 3-4 leukopenia (16.4% vs. 0%), neutropenia (14.8% vs. 1.6%), and nausea (4.9% vs. 0%). No significant difference in grade 3-4 diarrhea and no treatment-related deaths were observed in both groups.
conclusionsThe combination of irinotecan with S-1 was similarly tolerable but significantly prolonged PFS compared to S-1 monotherapy as a second- or third-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic ESCC. Clinical Trial Registration NCT02319187. Registered on December 9, 2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.