Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30940136›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2019

Barriers to using new needles encountered by rural Appalachian people who inject drugs: implications for needle exchange.

Stephen M Davis, Alfgeir L Kristjansson, Danielle Davidov, Keith Zullig, Adam Baus, Melanie Fisher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Substance use & misuse · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Factors associated with perceived ease of access to syringes in Appalachian North Carolina.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen M DavisDepartment of Health Policy, Management, and Leadership, School of Public Health, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, PO Box 9190, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. smdavis@hsc.wvu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0392-3364
Alfgeir L KristjanssonDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, West Virginia University, PO Box 9190, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Danielle DavidovDepartment of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University, PO Box 9149, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Keith ZulligDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, West Virginia University, PO Box 9190, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Adam BausDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, West Virginia University, PO Box 9190, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Melanie FisherDepartment of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, West Virginia University, PO Box 9163, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
West Virginia University · US

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942West Virginia University Department of Emergency Medicine Internal
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing a new needle for every injection can reduce the spread of infectious disease among people who inject drugs (PWID). No previous study has examined new needle use barriers among PWIDs residing in the rural Appalachian part of the United States, an area currently in the midst of a heroin epidemic.

objectiveTherefore, our primary aim was to explore self-reported barriers to using a new needle by PWID attending a needle exchange program (NEP).

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of PWID attending two NEPs in rural West Virginia located in the heart of Central Appalachia. A convenience sample of PWID (n = 100) completed the Barriers to Using New Needles Questionnaire.

resultsThe median number of barriers reported was 5 (range 0-19). Fear of arrest by police (72% of PWID "agreed" or "strongly agreed") and difficulty with purchasing needles from a pharmacy (64% "agreed" or "strongly agreed") were the most frequently cited barriers. CONCLUSIONS/IMPORTANCE: Congruent with previous findings from urban locations, in rural West Virginia, the ability of PWID to use a new needle obtained from a needle exchange for every injection may be compromised by fear of arrest. In addition, pharmacy sales of new needles to PWID may be blunted by an absence of explicit laws mandating nonprescription sales. Future studies should explore interventions that align the public health goals of NEPs with the occupational safety of law enforcement and health outreach goals of pharmacists.

Indexed as

FearLaw EnforcementNeedle-Exchange ProgramsOpioid-Related DisordersSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAdolescentAdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersAppalachian RegionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHepatitis CHumansLegislation, DrugMaleMiddle AgedBarriers to using new needlesHepatitis C virusNeedle exchange programsParaphernalia lawsPeople who inject drugsPolicing behaviors

Identifiers

PMID30940136
PMCPMC6444507
OpenAlexW2945091728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.