ArticleBMC public health2019
Attractive running environments for all? A cross-sectional study on physical environmental characteristics and runners' motives and attitudes, in relation to the experience of the running environment.
Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Associations between the built environment and jogging behaviour based on voluntarily contributed tracking data: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of health geographics · 2025Pooled it
- Foot and Lower Limb Clinical and Structural Changes in Overuse Injured Recreational Runners Using Floating Heel Shoes: Preliminary Results of a Randomised Control Trial.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Trial
- Effects of a wrapping closure lacing system on wearing comfort, lock-in stability, and lower-limb muscle demand during prolonged running.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Blue-green spaces, heat stress, and health-supportive public-space use under urban stress: machine learning and SEM evidence from jogging flow in Fuzhou, China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Built environment determinants of residents' running activity in Guangzhou, China: what are the nonlinear relationship and pathways?BMC public health · 2025Article
- Stride by Stride: How Run Clubs Foster Public Health.American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Runnability: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Does environmental attention differ during walking, jogging, and cycling in greenways? Evidence from eye movement responses to videos.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- What factors influence the willingness and intensity of regular mobile physical activity?- A machine learning analysis based on a sample of 290 cities in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Building running-friendly cities: effects of streetscapes on running using 9.73 million fitness tracker data in Shanghai, China.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Neighborhood greenness and participation in specific types of recreational physical activities in the Sister Study.Environmental research · 2024Article
- Environmental Preferences and Concerns of Recreational Trail Runners.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- The frequency and performance trends of European countries in the U18 and U20 rankings for 1500 m and 3000 m between 2009-2020.Sports medicine and health science · 2023Article
- Flat versus Simulated Mountain Trail Running: A Multidisciplinary Comparison in Well-Trained Runners.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- The subject-environment interplay between runners from different Brazilian macro-regions.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Differences in training characteristics of recreational endurance runners by race distance - results from the NURMI Study (Step 2).Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Neighborhood Characteristics Associated with Running in Metro Vancouver: A Preliminary Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Two of a Kind? Similarities and Differences between Runners and Walkers in Sociodemographic Characteristics, Sports Related Characteristics and Wearable Usage.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Direct Observation of COVID-19 Prevention Behaviors and Physical Activity in Public Open Spaces.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Risk Factors for Injuries in Runners: A Systematic Review of Foot Strike Technique and Its Classification at Impact.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRunning has become one of the most popular sports and has proven benefits for public health. Policy makers are increasingly aware that attractively designed public spaces may promote running. However, little is known about what makes a running environment attractive and restorative for runners and to what extent this depends on characteristics of the runner. This study aims to investigate 1) to what extent intrapersonal characteristics (i.e. motives and attitudes) and perceived environmental characteristics (e.g. quality of the running surface, greenness of the route, feelings of safety and hinderance by other road users) are associated with the perceived attractiveness and restorative capacity of the running environment and 2) to what extent the number of years of running experience modify these associations.
methodsCross-sectional data were collected through the online Eindhoven Running Survey 2015 (ERS15) among half marathon runners (N = 2477; response rate 26.6%). Linear regression analyses were performed for two outcomes separately (i.e. perceived attractiveness and perceived restorative capacity of the running environment) to investigate their relations with motives and attitudes, perceived environmental characteristics and interactions between perceived environmental characteristics and number of years of running experience.
resultsPerceived environmental characteristics, including green and lively routes and a comfortable running surface were more important for runners' evaluation of the attractiveness and restorative capacity of the running environment than runners' motives and attitudes. In contrast to experienced runners, perceived hinder from unleashed dogs and pedestrians positively impacted the attractiveness and restorative capacity for less experienced runners.
conclusionsPerceived environmental characteristics were important determinants of the attractiveness and restorative capacity of the running environment for both novice and experienced runners. However, green and lively elements in the running environment and hinderances by cars were more important for less experienced runners. In order to keep novice runners involved in running it is recommended to design comfortable running tracks and routes and provide good access to attractive, green and lively spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.