Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30940098›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2019

Development and validation of measurement tools for user experience evaluation surveys in the public primary healthcare facilities in Greece: a mixed methods study.

Daphne Kaitelidou, Charalambos Economou, Petros Galanis, Olympia Konstantakopoulou, Olga Siskou, Silviu Domente, Dolf de Boer, Wienke G Boerma, Peter P Groenewegen

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development and calibration data for the Healthcare Access Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daphne KaitelidouCentre for Health Services Management and Evaluation (CHESME), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Faculty of Nursing, Athens, Greece.
Charalambos EconomouPanteion University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Petros GalanisCentre for Health Services Management and Evaluation (CHESME), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Faculty of Nursing, Athens, Greece.
Olympia KonstantakopoulouCentre for Health Services Management and Evaluation (CHESME), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Faculty of Nursing, Athens, Greece.
Olga SiskouAdjunct Faculty Member (Tutor) on Open University of Cyprus (OUC), Centre for Health Services Management and Evaluation (CHESME), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Faculty of Nursing, Athens, Greece. olga.siskou@ouc.ac.cy.
Silviu DomenteWHO Europe Regional Office, Athens, Greece.
Dolf de BoerNetherlands Institute for Health Services research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wienke G BoermaNetherlands Institute for Health Services research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter P GroenewegenNetherlands Institute for Health Services research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe public primary healthcare system in Greece has not been fully developed and is delivered by urban and rural health centers, outpatient departments in public hospitals and the recently established first-contact and decentralized local primary care units. The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool for conducting periodic user experience evaluation surveys in public Primary HealthCare facilities in Greece such as outpatient clinics of public hospitals and health centers.

methodsA mixed methods approach was applied. In particular, the methodology of developing and validating the tools included three steps: (a) establishment of the theoretical background/literature review, (b) qualitative study: development of the tools items and establishment of the face validity and (c) quantitative study: pilot testing and establishment of the structural validity and estimation of the internal consistency of the tools. Two patient focus groups participated in qualitative study: one visiting health centres and the other visiting the outpatient clinics of public hospitals. Quantitative study included 733 Primary Health Care services' users/patients and was conducted during August-October 2017. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was performed to check for structural validity of the tools, while Cronbach's alpha coefficients were estimated to check for reliability.

resultsConfirmatory factor analysis confirmed almost perfectly the presumed theoretical model and the following six factors were identified through the tools: (a) accessibility (three items, e.g. opening hours), (b) continuity and coordination of care (three items, e.g. doctor asks for medical history), (c) comprehensiveness of care (three items, e.g. doctor provides advices for healthy life), (d) quality of medical care (four items, e.g. sufficient examination time), (e) facility (four items, e.g. comfortable waiting room) and (f) quality of care provided by nurses and other health professionals (four items, e.g. polite nurses).

conclusionsWe have developed reliable and valid tools to measure users' experiences in public Primary HealthCare facilities in Greece. These tools could be very useful in examining differences between different types of public Primary Health Care facilities and different populations.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareHealth Facility EnvironmentHealth Services AccessibilityPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareProfessional-Family RelationsQuality of Health CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalGreeceHospitals, PublicHumansOutpatient Clinics, HospitalPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsGreeceMeasurement toolPrimary healthcareUsers’ experienceValidation

Identifiers

PMID30940098
PMCPMC6444824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.