Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30940082›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

NITPicker: selecting time points for follow-up experiments.

Daphne Ezer, Joseph Keir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Optimal experimental design for mathematical models of haematopoiesis.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  5. What is quantitative plant biology?Quantitative plant biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daphne EzerDepartment of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. dezer@turing.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1685-6909
Joseph KeirDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0WA, UK.

Funding

REGULATION OF MACROPHAGE FUNCTION BY INTERLEUKIN-2K08CA001360 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ECONOMOU, JAMES S. · 1988 to 1990
–
Alan Turing Institute TU/A/000017Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S001360/1Trinity College, University of Cambridge NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe design of an experiment influences both what a researcher can measure, as well as how much confidence can be placed in the results. As such, it is vitally important that experimental design decisions do not systematically bias research outcomes. At the same time, making optimal design decisions can produce results leading to statistically stronger conclusions. Deciding where and when to sample are among the most critical aspects of many experimental designs; for example, we might have to choose the time points at which to measure some quantity in a time series experiment. Choosing times which are too far apart could result in missing short bursts of activity. On the other hand, there may be time points which provide very little information regarding the overall behaviour of the quantity in question.

resultsIn this study, we develop a tool called NITPicker (Next Iteration Time-point Picker) for selecting optimal time points (or spatial points along a single axis), that eliminates some of the biases caused by human decision-making, while maximising information about the shape of the underlying curves. NITPicker uses ideas from the field of functional data analysis. NITPicker is available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) and code for drawing figures is available on Github ( https://github.com/ezer/NITPicker ).

conclusionsNITPicker performs well on diverse real-world datasets that would be relevant for varied biological applications, including designing follow-up experiments for longitudinal gene expression data, weather pattern changes over time, and growth curves.

Indexed as

Follow-Up StudiesResearch DesignSoftwareDynamicsExperimental designFunctional data analysisLongitudinalRNA-seqTime series

Identifiers

PMID30940082
PMCPMC6444531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.