Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30940079›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical research methodology2019

Comparison and validation of accelerometer wear time and non-wear time algorithms for assessing physical activity levels in children and adolescents.

Jérémy Vanhelst, Florian Vidal, Elodie Drumez, Laurent Béghin, Jean-Benoît Baudelet, Stéphanie Coopman, Frédéric Gottrand

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical research methodology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02844101 (Assess Whether Knowledge by the Children and Adolescents of the Function of the Accelerometer Determines Its Amount of Physical Activity), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02844101 nacompletednot on this map

Assess Whether Knowledge by the Children and Adolescents of the Function of the Accelerometer Determines Its Amount of Physical Activity

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, LilleRan2013 to 2015Enrolled80ConditionsPhysical ActivityArmsGT3X Actigraph accelerometer.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Association of physical activity and rest-activity rhythm with sustained attention and melatonin among community-dwelling older adults.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identifying chest-worn light logger adherence: a validation study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jérémy VanhelstUniversity of Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, CIC 1403 - Centre d'investigation clinique, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59037 Lille Cedex, F-59000, Lille, France. jeremy.vanhelst@chru-lille.fr.
Florian VidalUniversity of Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, CIC 1403 - Centre d'investigation clinique, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59037 Lille Cedex, F-59000, Lille, France.
Elodie DrumezUniversity of Lille, CHU Lille, EA 2694 - Public Health: epidemiology and quality of care, F-59000, Lille, France.
Laurent BéghinUniversity of Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, CIC 1403 - Centre d'investigation clinique, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59037 Lille Cedex, F-59000, Lille, France.
Jean-Benoît BaudeletUniversity of Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, CIC 1403 - Centre d'investigation clinique, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59037 Lille Cedex, F-59000, Lille, France.
Stéphanie CoopmanUniversity of Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, CIC 1403 - Centre d'investigation clinique, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59037 Lille Cedex, F-59000, Lille, France.
Frédéric GottrandUniversity of Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, CIC 1403 - Centre d'investigation clinique, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59037 Lille Cedex, F-59000, Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccelerometers are widely used to measure sedentary time and daily physical activity (PA). However, data collection and processing criteria, such as non-wear time rules might affect the assessment of total PA and sedentary time and the associations with health variables. The study aimed to investigate whether the choice of different non-wear time definitions would affect the outcomes of PA levels in youth.

methodsSeventy-seven healthy youngsters (44 boys), aged 10-17 years, wore an accelerometer and kept a non-wear log diary during 4 consecutives days. We compared 7 published algorithms (10, 15, 20, 30, 60 min of continuous zeros, Choi, and Troiano algorithms). Agreements of each algorithm with the log diary method were assessed using Bland-Altmans plots and by calculating the concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measures.

resultsVariations in time spent in sedentary and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) were 30 and 3.7%. Compared with the log diary method, greater discrepancies were found for the algorithm 10 min (p < 0.001). For the time assessed in sedentary, the agreement with diary was excellent for the 4 algorithms (Choi, r = 0.79; Troiano, r = 0.81; 30 min, r = 0.79; 60 min, r = 0.81). Concordance for each method was excellent for the assessment of time spent in MVPA (> 0.86). The agreement for the wear time assessment was excellent for 5 algorithms (Choi r = 0.79; Troiano r = 0.79; 20 min r = 0.77; 30 min r = 0.80; 60 min r = 0.80).

conclusionsThe choice of non-wear time rules may considerably affect the sedentary time assessment in youth. Using of appropriate data reduction decision in youth is needed to limit differences in associations between health outcomes and sedentary behaviors and may improve comparability for future studies. Based on our results, we recommend the use of the algorithm of 30 min of continuous zeros for defining non-wear time to improve the accuracy in assessing PA levels in youth.

trial registrationNCT02844101 (retrospectively registered at July 13th 2016).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSedentary BehaviorAccelerometryAdolescentChildChi-Square DistributionExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMonitoring, AmbulatoryOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsActivity monitorAlgorithmsFree living conditionsWear timeYoung

Identifiers

PMID30940079
PMCPMC6444637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.