Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30940064›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Genomics overrules mitochondrial DNA, siding with morphology on a controversial case of species delimitation.

Carmen Del R Pedraza-Marrón, Raimundo Silva, Jonathan Deeds, Steven M Van Belleghem, Alicia Mastretta-Yanes, Omar Domínguez-Domínguez, Rafael A Rivero-Vega, Loretta Lutackas, Debra Murie, Daryl Parkyn and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A new species ofZooKeys · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Carmen Del R Pedraza-Marrón1 Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico , Río Piedras, PO Box 23360, San Juan, PR 00931 , USA.
Raimundo Silva3 Instituto de Estudos Costeiros, Laboratório de Genética Aplicada , Campus Bragança, Alameda Leandro Ribeiro, S/N, Aldeia, 68600-000 Bragança, Pará , Brazil.
Jonathan Deeds5 USFDA Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition , 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, MD 20740 , USA.
Steven M Van Belleghem1 Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico , Río Piedras, PO Box 23360, San Juan, PR 00931 , USA.
Alicia Mastretta-Yanes6 CONACYT Research Fellow - Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, México , Liga Periférico - Insurgentes Sur, No. 4903, 14010, México, DF , México.
Omar Domínguez-Domínguez7 Laboratorio de Biología Acuática, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Ciudad Universitaria , 58000, Morelia, Michoacán , México.
Rafael A Rivero-Vega1 Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico , Río Piedras, PO Box 23360, San Juan, PR 00931 , USA.
Loretta Lutackas1 Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico , Río Piedras, PO Box 23360, San Juan, PR 00931 , USA.
Debra Murie9 University of Florida, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Program of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences , Gainesville, FL 32653 , USA.
Daryl Parkyn9 University of Florida, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Program of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences , Gainesville, FL 32653 , USA.
Lewis H Bullock10 Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute , 100 8th Ave SE, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 , USA.
Kristin Foss11 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission , Farris Bryant Building, 620 S. Meridian St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1600 , USA.
Humberto Ortiz-Zuazaga2 Computer Science Department, University of Puerto Rico , Río Piedras, PO Box 23360, San Juan, PR 00931 , USA.
Juan Narváez-Barandica12 Universidad del Magdalena , carrera 32 No. 22-08 Santa Marta, Magdalena , Colombia.
Arturo Acero13 Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Caribe Cecimar , El Rodadero, Santa Marta , Colombia.
Grazielle Gomes3 Instituto de Estudos Costeiros, Laboratório de Genética Aplicada , Campus Bragança, Alameda Leandro Ribeiro, S/N, Aldeia, 68600-000 Bragança, Pará , Brazil.
Ricardo Betancur-R14 Department of Biology, The University of Oklahoma , 730 Van Vleet Oval, Room 314, Norman, OK 73019 , USA.

Funding

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY & EDUCATION CORE (STCE)P20GM103475 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI Humberto Guillermo Ortiz-Zuazaga · 2012 to 2026
$52.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species delimitation is a major quest in biology and is essential for adequate management of the organismal diversity. A challenging example comprises the fish species of red snappers in the Western Atlantic. Red snappers have been traditionally recognized as two separate species based on morphology: Lutjanus campechanus (northern red snapper) and L. purpureus (southern red snapper). Recent genetic studies using mitochondrial markers, however, failed to delineate these nominal species, leading to the current lumping of the northern and southern populations into a single species ( L. campechanus). This decision carries broad implications for conservation and management as red snappers have been commercially over-exploited across the Western Atlantic and are currently listed as vulnerable. To address this conflict, we examine genome-wide data collected throughout the range of the two species. Population genomics, phylogenetic and coalescent analyses favour the existence of two independent evolutionary lineages, a result that confirms the morphology-based delimitation scenario in agreement with conventional taxonomy. Despite finding evidence of introgression in geographically neighbouring populations in northern South America, our genomic analyses strongly support isolation and differentiation of these species, suggesting that the northern and southern red snappers should be treated as distinct taxonomic entities.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationAnimalsAtlantic OceanCaribbean RegionDNA, MitochondrialGenomeGulf of AmericaPerciformesPhylogenyDNA, MitochondrialBayes factor delimitationintrogressionmito-nuclear discordanceSNP dataspecies delimitation

Identifiers

PMID30940064
PMCPMC6501682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.