Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30939819›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Ultrasonic Treatment Increases Extraction Rate of Common Bean (

Qiong-Qiong Yang, Ren-You Gan, Ying-Ying Ge, Dan Zhang, And Harold Corke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hydration and Fortification of Common Bean (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction of Flavonoids fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Role ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Total Saponins fromDrug design, development and therapy · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qiong-Qiong YangDepartment of Food Science & Technology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. yangqiongqiong@sjtu.edu.cn.
Ren-You GanDepartment of Food Science & Technology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. renyougan@sjtu.edu.cn.
Ying-Ying GeDepartment of Food Science & Technology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. gy1994@sjtu.edu.cn.
Dan ZhangDepartment of Food Science & Technology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. zhang.dan@sjtu.edu.cn.
And Harold CorkeDepartment of Food Science & Technology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. hcorke@sjtu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFC1600100Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology Key Program 18391900600Shanghai Basic and Key Program 18TC1410800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The feasibility of improving the extraction rate of common bean antioxidants by ultrasonic treatment was investigated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and spectrum Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FT-IR) analysis revealed that ultrasonic treatment substantially altered the cellular structure of common bean seed, resulting in increased surface area, eroded cell walls, and greater exposure of cellulose and hemicellulose. The highest antioxidant activity was obtained at optimal extraction conditions (68 min, 55% acetone, 36:1 liquid to solid ratio, 30 ℃, and 480 W) which were optimized by response surface methodology. In terms of the extraction rate of common bean antioxidants, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) exhibits about seven-fold higher extraction efficiency than conventional solvent extraction (CSE). In addition, 10 phenolic compounds in the common bean extracts were detected and quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), including protocatechuic acid, catechin, chlorogenic acid, epicatechin, ferulic acid, coumarin, rutin, myricetin, cinnamic acid, and genistein. In summary, ultrasonic treatment is an ideal candidate methodology for improving the extraction rate of common bean antioxidants.

Indexed as

antioxidant propertiesextraction optimizationPhaseolus vulgarisphenolic compoundssonication

Identifiers

PMID30939819
PMCPMC6523112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.