Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30939804›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2019

A Novel Toolkit for Characterizing the Mechanical and Electrical Properties of Engineered Neural Tissues.

Meghan Robinson, Karolina Papera Valente, Stephanie M Willerth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meghan RobinsonBiomedical Engineering Program, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C. V8W 2Y2, Canada. meghanro@uvic.ca.
Karolina Papera ValenteDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C. V8W 2Y2, Canada. kvalente@uvic.ca.
Stephanie M WillerthDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C. V8W 2Y2, Canada. willerth@uvic.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1665-7723

Funding

Canada Research Chairs Chair in Biomedical EngineeringNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have designed and validated a set of robust and non-toxic protocols for directly evaluating the properties of engineered neural tissue. These protocols characterize the mechanical properties of engineered neural tissues and measure their electrophysical activity. The protocols obtain elastic moduli of very soft fibrin hydrogel scaffolds and voltage readings from motor neuron cultures. Neurons require soft substrates to differentiate and mature, however measuring the elastic moduli of soft substrates remains difficult to accurately measure using standard protocols such as atomic force microscopy or shear rheology. Here we validate a direct method for acquiring elastic modulus of fibrin using a modified Hertz model for thin films. In this method, spherical indenters are positioned on top of the fibrin samples, generating an indentation depth that is then correlated with elastic modulus. Neurons function by transmitting electrical signals to one another and being able to assess the development of electrical signaling serves is an important verification step when engineering neural tissues. We then validated a protocol wherein the electrical activity of motor neural cultures is measured directly by a voltage sensitive dye and a microplate reader without causing damage to the cells. These protocols provide a non-destructive method for characterizing the mechanical and electrical properties of living spinal cord tissues using novel biosensing methods.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesOptical ImagingTissue EngineeringCells, CulturedElastic ModulusFluorescent DyesHumansHydrogelsNeuronsStress, MechanicalFluorescent DyesHydrogelsbiomedical deviceselastic moduluselectrophysiologyrheologytissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID30939804
PMCPMC6627085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.