Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30939787›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Gendered Working Environments as a Determinant of Mental Health Inequalities: A Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Allison Milner, Anna J Scovelle, Tania L King, Claudia H Marck, Ashley McAllister, Anne M Kavanagh, Marissa Shields, Eszter Török, Adrienne O'Neil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Salud publica de Mexico · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Longitudinal Analysis of Psychosocial Stressors and Body Mass Index in Middle-Aged and Older Adults in the United States.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Allison MilnerCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health; University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia. allison.milner@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4657-0503
Anna J ScovelleCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health; University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia. anna.scovelle@unimelb.edu.au.
Tania L KingCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health; University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia. tking@unimelb.edu.au.
Claudia H MarckCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health; University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia. claudia.marck@unimelb.edu.au.
Ashley McAllisterEquity and Health Policy, Department of Public Health Sciences; Karolinska Institute, 162 54 Stockholm, Sweden. ashley.mcallister@ki.se.
Anne M KavanaghCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health; University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia. a.kavanagh@unimelb.edu.au.
Marissa ShieldsCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health; University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia. marissa.shields@unimelb.edu.au.
Eszter TörökDepartment of Public Health; University of Copenhagen, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark. eszt@sund.ku.dk.
Adrienne O'NeilCentre for Mental Health, School of Population and Global Health; University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia. adrienne.oneil@unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both gender and employment are critical and intersecting social determinants of mental and physical health. This paper describes the protocol used to conduct a systematic literature review of the relationship between "gendered working environments" and mental health. Gendered working environments (GWE) are conceptualised as involving: (1) differences in selection into work, and more specifically, occupations; (2) variation in employment arrangements and working hours; (3) disparities in psychosocial exposures at work, and; (4) differences in selection out of work. Methods/design: The review will adhere to a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) search procedure. Key words will be identified that are specific to each of the four domains of GWE. The databases used for the search will be Scopus, Pubmed, Proquest, and Web of Science. Keywords will be adapted for the specific requirements of each electronic database. Inclusion criteria are: Using a validated scale to measure mental health (outcome); including exposures related to the four domains of GWE; reporting estimates for both men and women; and use of a cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional design. Studies will be excluded if they were published more than 10 years ago, are not in English or do not present extractable data on the relationship between GWE and mental health. Discussion: The proposed review will provide evidence about the numerous and complex ways in which employment and gender intersect (and are reinforced) to influence mental health over the life course.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesMental HealthSex FactorsSystematic Reviews as TopicEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleemploymentgenderinequalitiesmental healthreviewwork

Identifiers

PMID30939787
PMCPMC6479308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.