Advances in Methylmercury Toxicology and Risk Assessment.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Recent Progress in Nanotechnology-Based Approaches for Food Monitoring.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
   Review
2. Armed conflict, pollution, and health risks: A risk evaluation of three sources of environmental exposure associated with the conflict in ColombiaBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2021
   Article
3. Regionally representative hair mercury levels in Canadian First Nations adults living on reserves.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021
   Article
4. Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels and Related Risk Factors among Thai Children Residing in a Fishing Community.Toxics · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract