Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30939267›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2019

Evaluation of a Novel Financial Navigator Pilot to Address Patient Concerns about Medical Care Costs.

Matthew P Banegas, John F Dickerson, Nicole L Friedman, David Mosen, Althea X Ender, T Ruth Chang, Tracy A Runge, Mark C Hornbrook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cancer survivor preferences on the timing and content of interventions to mitigate financial toxicity associated with cancer treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Factors associated with increased financial toxicity after the completion of radiation treatment for gynecologic cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Medical Financial Hardship Intensity and Financial Sacrifice Associated with Cancer in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew P BanegasKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR.
John F DickersonKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR.
Nicole L FriedmanKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR.
David MosenKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR.
Althea X EnderKaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR.
T Ruth ChangKaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR.
Tracy A RungeKaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR.
Mark C HornbrookKaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextInterventions are required that address patients' medically related financial needs.

objectiveTo evaluate a Financial Navigator pilot addressing patients' concerns/needs regarding medical care costs in an integrated health care system.

methodsAdults (aged ≥ 18 years) enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Northwest, who had a concern/need about medical care costs and received care in 1 of 3 clinical departments at the intervention or comparison clinic were recruited between August 1, 2016, and October 31, 2016. Baseline and 30-day follow-up participant surveys were administered to assess medical and nonmedical socioeconomic needs, satisfaction with medical care, and satisfaction with assistance with cost concerns. Physicians at both clinics were invited to complete a survey on medical care costs. We assessed participant characteristics and survey responses using descriptive statistics and 30-day change in satisfaction measures using multivariable linear regression models.

resultsEighty-five intervention and 51 comparison participants completed the baseline survey. At baseline, intervention participants reported transportation (52.9%), housing (38.2%), and social isolation (32.4%) needs; comparison participants identified employment (33.3%), food (33.3%), and housing (33.3%) needs. Intervention participants reported higher satisfaction with care (p = 0.01) and higher satisfaction with cost concerns assistance (p = 0.01) vs comparison participants at 30-day follow-up, controlling for baseline responses. Although most physicians (80%) reported discussing medical care costs with their patients, only 18% reported knowing about their patients' financial well-being.

conclusionWe demonstrated the promise of a novel Financial Navigator pilot intervention to address medical care cost concerns and needs, and underscored the prevalence of nonmedical social needs in an economically vulnerable population.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30939267
PMCPMC6380481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.