Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30939188›Full record

Trial reportPhysical therapy2019

Effectiveness of a "Spring Pillow" Versus Education in Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Carla Vanti, Federico Banchelli, Claudia Marino, Andrea Puccetti, Andrew A Guccione, Paolo Pillastrini

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physical therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Carla VantiDepartment of Biomedical and Neurological Sciences, Occupational Medicine Unit, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Federico BanchelliDepartment of Diagnostics, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, Statistics Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Claudia MarinoDepartment of Biomedical and Neurological Sciences, Occupational Medicine Unit, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea PuccettiDepartment of Biomedical and Neurological Sciences, Occupational Medicine Unit, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Andrew A GuccioneDepartment of Rehabilitation Science, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.
Paolo PillastriniDepartment of Biomedical and Neurological Sciences, Occupational Medicine Unit, University of Bologna, via P. Palagi 9-40138, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITGeorge Mason University · USUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent types of pillows have been proposed for neck pain, but no previous randomized controlled trial has investigated the effectiveness of a "spring pillow" for adults with chronic nonspecific neck pain.

objectiveWe evaluated the effectiveness of using a pillow made from viscoelastic polyurethane and 60 independent springs compared with an educational intervention in individuals with chronic nonspecific neck pain.

designThis was a randomized controlled trial with crossover study design.

settingThe setting was the Occupational Medicine Unit, University Hospital, Bologna (Italy).

participantsWe recruited 70 adults with chronic nonspecific neck pain, of whom 64 completed the trial.

interventionParticipants were randomly assigned to 2 groups. One group used the spring pillow for 4 weeks, and the other group followed educational advice for 4 weeks while continuing to use their own pillows. After 4 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks of washout, groups were crossed over. Pain perceived in the neck, thoracic, and shoulder areas and headache were the primary outcome measures. In addition, disability, sleep quality, subjective improvement, and pillow comfort were assessed. Measures were captured at pretreatment, after 4 weeks, after the 4-week washout period, and 4 weeks after crossover. The mean differences (MD) in outcomes between groups were assessed.

resultsTreatment with the spring pillow appeared to reduce neck pain (MD = -8.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -14.7 to -2.6), thoracic pain (MD = -8.4; 95% CI = -15.2 to -1.5), and headache (MD = -16.0; 95% CI = -23.2 to -8.7). Reductions in shoulder pain were not statistically significant between groups (MD = -6.9; 95% CI = -14.1-0.3). Neither the crossover sequence nor the period (first vs second intervention administration) significantly affected the results. LIMITATIONS: Education may not have been the best comparator for the spring pillow; drug consumption, actual pillow use, and the implementation of the educational suggestions as prescribed were not controlled.

conclusionsUse of the spring pillow in this study was more effective than an educational intervention for improving cervical, thoracic, and head pain. Whether a spring pillow is more effective than other ergonomic pillows remains to be tested.

Indexed as

Bedding and LinensPatient Education as TopicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChest PainChronic PainConfidence IntervalsCross-Over StudiesEquipment DesignFemaleHeadacheHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeck PainPolyurethanesViscoelastic Substances

Identifiers

PMID30939188
PMCPMC6736423
OpenAlexW2933702925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.