SynthesisJournal of women's health (2002)2019
Cervical Cancer Screening Access, Outcomes, and Prevalence of Dysplasia in Correctional Facilities: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of women's health (2002), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of cervical cancer and high-grade lesions in vulnerable women a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nature communications · 2026Pooled it
- Implementing women's sexual and reproductive health interventions in prisons: a realist review.BMJ open · 2026Review
- Gynecologic conditions in the context of incarceration: A scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- The effect of a cervical testing campaign on incarcerated females- a repeated cross-sectional study in Norwegian prisons.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Adherence and Willingness to Participate in Cancer Screening Programs Among Women Living in Prison: A Cross-Sectional Study in Southern Italy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparing Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies in an Incarcerated Population.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2024Article
- Examining inequities associated with incarceration among breast cancer patients.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Cancer Screening Rates and Outcomes for Justice-Involved Individuals: A Scoping Review.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2023Article
- Public Health and Prisons: Priorities in the Age of Mass Incarceration.Annual review of public health · 2023Review
- Health services use among formerly incarcerated Louisiana Medicaid members within one year of release.PloS one · 2023Article
- HPV Vaccination and Cervical Cancer Screening: Assessing Awareness, Attitudes, and Adherence in Detained Women.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Cervical Cancer Prevention Behaviors Among Criminal-Legal Involved Women from Three U.S. Cities.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2022Article
- Abnormal Pap Follow-Up among Criminal-Legal Involved Women in Three U.S. Cities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, November 2020.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2020Article
- Assessing the Capacity of Health Facilities to Deliver Concomitant HPV Vaccination and HPV-Based Cervical Screening Services to Vulnerable Populations - An Implementation Research Protocol.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.