Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30938776›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2019

Building deep learning models for evidence classification from the open access biomedical literature.

Gully A Burns, Xiangci Li, Nanyun Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DeIDNER Model: A Neural Network Named Entity Recognition Model for Use in the De-identification of Clinical Notes.Biomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. UPCLASS: a deep learning-based classifier for UniProtKB entry publications.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gully A BurnsChan Zuckerberg Initiative, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Xiangci LiInformation Sciences Institute, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, USA.
Nanyun PengInformation Sciences Institute, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, USA.

Funding

Evidence Extraction Systems for the Molecular Interaction LiteratureR01LM012592 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI PENG, NANYUN VIOLET · 2017 to 2020
$1.1M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate the application of deep learning to biocuration tasks that involve classification of text associated with biomedical evidence in primary research articles. We developed a large-scale corpus of molecular papers derived from PubMed and PubMed Central open access records and used it to train deep learning word embeddings under the GloVe, FastText and ELMo algorithms. We applied those models to a distant supervised method classification task based on text from figure captions or fragments surrounding references to figures in the main text using a variety or models and parameterizations. We then developed document classification (triage) methods for molecular interaction papers by using deep learning mechanisms of attention to aggregate classification-based decisions over selected paragraphs in the document. We were able to obtain triage performance with an accuracy of 0.82 using a combined convolutional neural network, bi-directional long short-term memory architecture augmented by attention to produce a single decision for triage. In this work, we hope to encourage biocuration systems developers to apply deep learning methods to their specialized tasks by repurposing large-scale word embedding to apply to their data.

Indexed as

Deep LearningModels, TheoreticalPublicationsNeural Networks, ComputerSemantics

Identifiers

PMID30938776
PMCPMC6449534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.