ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
Assessing reproducibility of matrix factorization methods in independent transcriptomes.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptional regulatory network differences between six industrialMetabolic engineering communications · 2026Article
- Review
- iModulonMiner and PyModulon: Software for unsupervised mining of gene expression compendia.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A network of transcriptomic signatures identifies novel comorbidity mechanisms between schizophrenia and somatic disorders.Discover mental health · 2024Article
- Article
- robustica: customizable robust independent component analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Codabench: Flexible, easy-to-use, and reproducible meta-benchmark platform.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Independent component analysis recovers consistent regulatory signals from disparate datasets.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- iModulonDB: a knowledgebase of microbial transcriptional regulation derived from machine learning.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Meta-Analysis of Esophageal Cancer Transcriptomes Using Independent Component Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Machine learning uncovers independently regulated modules in the Bacillus subtilis transcriptome.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Deconvolution of transcriptomes and miRNomes by independent component analysis provides insights into biological processes and clinical outcomes of melanoma patients.BMC medical genomics · 2019Article
- Independent Component Analysis for Unraveling the Complexity of Cancer Omics Datasets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Molecular Inverse Comorbidity between Alzheimer's Disease and Lung Cancer: New Insights from Matrix Factorization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Probing lncRNA-Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationMatrix factorization (MF) methods are widely used in order to reduce dimensionality of transcriptomic datasets to the action of few hidden factors (metagenes). MF algorithms have never been compared based on the between-datasets reproducibility of their outputs in similar independent datasets. Lack of this knowledge might have a crucial impact when generalizing the predictions made in a study to others.
resultsWe systematically test widely used MF methods on several transcriptomic datasets collected from the same cancer type (14 colorectal, 8 breast and 4 ovarian cancer transcriptomic datasets). Inspired by concepts of evolutionary bioinformatics, we design a novel framework based on Reciprocally Best Hit (RBH) graphs in order to benchmark the MF methods for their ability to produce generalizable components. We show that a particular protocol of application of independent component analysis (ICA), accompanied by a stabilization procedure, leads to a significant increase in the between-datasets reproducibility. Moreover, we show that the signals detected through this method are systematically more interpretable than those of other standard methods. We developed a user-friendly tool for performing the Stabilized ICA-based RBH meta-analysis. We apply this methodology to the study of colorectal cancer (CRC) for which 14 independent transcriptomic datasets can be collected. The resulting RBH graph maps the landscape of interconnected factors associated to biological processes or to technological artifacts. These factors can be used as clinical biomarkers or robust and tumor-type specific transcriptomic signatures of tumoral cells or tumoral microenvironment. Their intensities in different samples shed light on the mechanistic basis of CRC molecular subtyping. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The RBH construction tool is available from http://goo.gl/DzpwYp. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.