Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30938427›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2019

Outcome prediction models in AQP4-IgG positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.

Jacqueline Palace, Dan-Yu Lin, Donglin Zeng, Masoud Majed, Liene Elsone, Shahd Hamid, Silvia Messina, Tatsuro Misu, Jessica Sagen, Daniel Whittam and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Relapse-related outcomes in the Danish population-based AQP4- antibody seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder cohort.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. PlasmaNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Jacqueline PalaceNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford, UK.
Dan-Yu LinDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Donglin ZengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Masoud MajedDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Liene ElsoneThe Walton Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Shahd HamidThe Walton Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Silvia MessinaNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford, UK.
Tatsuro MisuDepartment of Neurology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Jessica SagenClinical Research Unit, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Daniel WhittamThe Walton Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Yoshiki TakaiDepartment of Neurology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Maria Isabel LeiteNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford, UK.
Brian WeinshenkerDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Philippe CabreDepartment of Neurology, Fort-de-France University Hospital Center, Pierre Zobda Quitman Hospital, Fort-de-France, Martinique, France.
Anu JacobThe Walton Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Ichiro NakashimaDepartment of Neurology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kazuo FujiharaDepartment of Neurology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Sean J PittockDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USScience Oxford · GBTohoku University · JPUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWalton Centre · GBCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique · MQFukushima Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogenic antibodies targeting the aquaporin-4 water channel on astrocytes are associated with relapsing inflammatory neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. The clinical phenotype is characterized by recurrent episodes of optic neuritis, longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis, area postrema attacks and less common brainstem and cerebral events. Patients often develop major residual disability from these attacks, so early diagnosis and initiation of attackpreventing medications is important. Accurate prediction of relapse would assist physicians in counselling patients, planning treatment and designing clinical trials. We used a large multicentre dataset of 441 patients from the UK, USA, Japan and Martinique who collectively experienced 1976 attacks, and applied sophisticated mathematical modelling to predict likelihood of relapse and disability at different time points. We found that Japanese patients had a lower risk of subsequent attacks except for brainstem and cerebral events, with an overall relative relapse risk of 0.681 (P = 0.001) compared to Caucasians and African patients, who had a higher likelihood of cerebral attacks, with a relative relapse risk of 3.309 (P = 0.009) compared to Caucasians. Female patients had a higher chance of relapse than male patients (P = 0.009), and patients with younger age of onset were more likely to have optic neuritis relapses (P < 0.001). Immunosuppressant drugs reduced and multiple sclerosis disease-modifying agents increased the likelihood of relapse (P < 0.001). Patients with optic neuritis at onset were more likely to develop blindness (P < 0.001), and those with older age of onset were more likely to develop ambulatory disability. Only 25% of long-term disability was related to initial onset attack, indicating the importance of early attack prevention. With respect to selection of patients for clinical trial design, there would be no gain in power by selecting recent onset patients and only a small gain by selecting patients with recent high disease activity. We provide risk estimates of relapse and disability for patients diagnosed and treated with immunosuppressive treatments over the subsequent 2, 3, 5 and 10 years according to type of attack at onset or the first 2-year course, ethnicity, sex and onset age. This study supports significant effects of onset age, onset phenotype and ethnicity on neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders outcomes. Our results suggest that powering clinical treatment trials based upon relapse activity in the preceding 2 years may offer little benefit in the way of attack risk yet severely hamper clinical trial success.

Indexed as

Aquaporin 4Immunoglobulin GAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualEthnicityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsAQP4 protein, humanAquaporin 4Immunoglobulin GImmunosuppressive Agentsaquaporin-4disabilityneuromyelitis opticaoutcome prediction

Identifiers

PMID30938427
PMCPMC6487334
OpenAlexW2932668297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.