Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30938408›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2019

Re-examining access points to the different levels of health care: a cross-sectional series in Austria.

Kathryn Hoffmann, Aaron George, Elena Jirovsky, Thomas E Dorner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Comparison of the United States and Austrian Healthcare Needs and Systems.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kathryn HoffmannKathryn Hoffmann, MD, MPH, Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/I, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Aaron GeorgeDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA USA.
Elena JirovskyElena Jirovsky, PhD, Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/I, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Thomas E DornerThomas E. Dorner, MD, MPH, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/I, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is high variation in service utilization behaviour, health equity and outcomes among countries based upon the organization of access to primary and secondary care levels. Austria is a country with universal health coverage and access without clear delineation between access to primary and secondary care. The aim of this study was to investigate development of access points to the Austrian system over time and subsequent utilization.

methodsThe databases used were the Austrian Health Interview Surveys 2006/2007 and 2014, including 15 747 and 15 771 persons, respectively. Descriptive analysis of health services utilization behaviour and demographic factors were conducted. Logistic regression models were applied. Furthermore, differences between the two periods are shown.

resultUtilization of all services assessed was high in 2014 when compared to 2006/2007. Between these periods, a 6-7% increase in use of secondary care services was found. There was a 10.8% increase in access to specialist care services and 4.1% increase in hospital outpatient visits, each without prior General Practitioner (GP) visits. The largest increases were found in those groups that had previously demonstrated the lowest utilization behaviour of accessing specialist consultations and consultations without a prior GP visit.

conclusionDespite the lack of change to the health care system or access to care, there was an increase in utilization of secondary care services, with a lower percentage of patients seeking direct GP consultation. This is concerning for systems development, cost containment and quality of care, as it demonstrates a possible trend shifting away from primary care as initial access point.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAustriaCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30938408
PMCPMC6896971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.