Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30938248›Full record

SynthesisGlobal health action2019

Cervical cancer screening decentralized policy adaptation: an African rural-context-specific systematic literature review.

R Rahman, M D Clark, Z Collins, F Traore, E M Dioukhane, H Thiam, Y Ndiaye, E L De Jesus, N Danfakha, K E Peters and 8 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Global health action, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

R Rahmana University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences , Toledo , OH , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0122-1900
M D Clarkb Library of the Health Sciences , University Library, University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , IL , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4015-9596
Z Collinsd Department of Family Medicine, Institute for Health Research and Policy , University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) , Chicago , IL , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6254-8165
F Traoree Region medical de Kedougou , Bureau de la santé de la reproduction, prevention transmission mere enfant du VIH-SIDA , Kedougou , Senegal.
E M Dioukhanef Senegal Ministry of Health.
H Thiamg Region medical de Kedougou , Bureau régional de la formation, de la supervision et de la recherche , Kedougou , Senegal.
Y Ndiayeh Département de Recherche , Sénégal Ministère de la Santé et l'Action Sociale , Dakar , Sénégal.
E L De Jesusi School of Public Health (SPH) , University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) , Chicago , IL , USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7719-231X
N Danfakhaj John Snow, Inc , Arlington , VA , USA.
K E Petersk School of Public Health, Division of Community Health Sciences, Illinois Prevention Research Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy , University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) , Chicago , IL , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8334-1606
T Komarekl Uniformed Services University , Bethesda , MD , USA.
A M Linnm School of Public Health, Center for Communications Programs , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , MD , USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9720-2378
P E Linnn Logistics Management Institute , Tysons , VA , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2143-0045
K E Wallnero Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation , Washington , DC , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1633-4737
M Charlesp Department of Internal Medicine , University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , IL , USA.
M Hasnainq Department of Family Medicine , University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine , Chicago , IL , USA.
C E Petersonr School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, UI Cancer Center , University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) , Chicago , IL , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9868-9576
J A Dykenss Department of Family Medicine, Center for Global Health, Institute for Health Research and Policy, Cancer Center , University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) , Chicago , IL , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4194-8725

Funding

Illinois Prevention Research Center: Supporting Policy and Environmental ChangeU48DP005010 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI POWELL, LISA · 2014 to 2018
$6.6M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide, nearly 570,000 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer each year, with 85% of new cases in low- and middle-income countries. The African continent is home to 35 of 40 countries with the highest cervical cancer mortality rates. In 2014, a partnership involving a rural region of Senegal, West Africa, was facing cervical cancer screening service sustainability barriers and began adapting regional-level policy to address implementation challenges.

objectiveThis manuscript reports the findings of a systematic literature review describing the implementation of decentralized cervical cancer prevention services in Africa, relevant in context to the Senegal partnership. We report barriers and policy-relevant recommendations through Levesque's Patient-Centered Access to Healthcare Framework and discuss the impact of this information on the partnership's approach to shaping Senegal's regional cervical cancer screening policy.

methodsThe systematic review search strategy comprised two complementary sub-searches. We conducted an initial search identifying 4272 articles, then applied inclusion criteria, and ultimately 19 studies were included. Data abstraction focused on implementation barriers categorized with the Levesque framework and by policy relevance.

resultsOur findings identified specific demand-side (clients and community) and supply-side (health service-level) barriers to implementation of cervical cancer screening services. We identify the most commonly reported demand- and supply-side barriers and summarize salient policy recommendations discussed within the reviewed literature.

conclusionsOverall, there is a paucity of published literature regarding barriers to and best practices in implementation of cervical cancer screening services in rural Africa. Many articles in this literature review did describe findings with notable policy implications. The Senegal partnership has consulted this literature when faced with various similar barriers and has developed two principal initiatives to address contextual challenges. Other initiatives implementing cervical cancer visual screening services in decentralized areas may find this contextual reporting of a literature review helpful as a construct for identifying evidence for the purpose of guiding ongoing health service policy adaptation.

Indexed as

PoliticsRural PopulationAfricaDeveloping CountriesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansPolicyPovertyPregnancyUterine Cervical Neoplasmsglobal healthgynecologic cancerImplementationpartnershipvisual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid

Identifiers

PMID30938248
PMCPMC6450494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.