ArticleInternational wound journal2019
The effects of perioperative antibiotherapy on surgical site infections in sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus treated with rhomboid excision and Limberg transposition procedure.
Article in International wound journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pilonidal sinus disease is a common disorder. We aimed to evaluate the effects of perioperative antibiotherapy on surgical site infections in pilonidal sinus patients who were treated with rhomboid excision with Limberg transposition procedure. A total of 104 patients between 18 and 40 years of age (52 males, 52 females) were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups and evaluated because of the administration of perioperative antibiotherapy. On the 10th-day, first-month, and third-month follow ups, the status of the wound was recorded. No significant difference was found between the ages, gender distribution, and smoking. Wound dehiscence rate was higher in the non-antibiotic group on the 10th-day, first-month, and third-month follow up, whereas the rate of superficial infection was higher in the antibiotic group. None of the patients had any signs of recurrence. Antibiotic administration did not provide a significant advantage in terms of wound healing, surgical site infection, and recurrence. We think that perioperative antibiotherapy, except for patients with immunosuppression, diffuse cellulitis, or a major coexisting disease who were treated with rhomboid excision with Limberg transposition procedure, does not have any effect on healing surgical site infections and delaying early recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.