Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30938032›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2019

Feeding modes shape the acquisition and structure of the initial gut microbiota in newborn lambs.

Yanliang Bi, Madison S Cox, Fan Zhang, Garret Suen, Naifeng Zhang, Yan Tu, Qiyu Diao

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Understanding the Diversity and Roles of the Ruminal Microbiome.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Colonization and development of the gut microbiome in calves.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yanliang BiFeed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, 100081, Beijing, China.
Madison S CoxDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706-1521, Madison, USA.
Fan ZhangFeed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, 100081, Beijing, China.
Garret SuenDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706-1521, Madison, USA.
Naifeng ZhangFeed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, 100081, Beijing, China.
Yan TuFeed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, 100081, Beijing, China.
Qiyu DiaoFeed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, 100081, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8037-1471
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for Central Non-profit Scientific InstitutionNational Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFD0500500United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) WIS02007USDA Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Education and Literacy Initiative predoctoral fellowship 2018-67011-27997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early gut microbial colonization is important for postnatal metabolic and immune development. However, little is known about the effects of different feeding modes (suckling versus bottle-feeding) or microbial sources on this process in farm animals. We found that suckled and bottle-fed newborn lambs had their own distinct gut microbiota. Results from 16S rRNA gene sequencing and qPCR showed that, compared with suckling, bottle feeding significantly increased the abundances of Escherichia/Shigella, Butyricicoccus, and Clostridium XlVa, while significantly decreased the abundance of Clostridium XI. The higher levels of Escherichia/Shigella in bottle-fed lambs suggest that artificial feeding may increase the number of potential pathogens and delay the establishment of the anaerobic environment and anaerobic microbes. Feeding modes also affected the direct transmission of bacteria from the mother and the environment to newborns. The SourceTracker analysis estimated that the early gut microbes of suckled lambs were mainly derived from the mother's teats (43%) and ambient air (28%); whereas those of bottle-fed lambs were dominated by bacteria from the mother's vagina (46%), ambient air (31%), and the sheep pen floor (12%). These findings advance our understanding of gut microbiota in early life and may help design techniques to improve gut microbiota and health.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBacteriaBottle FeedingFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInfant, NewbornRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSheepVaginaRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30938032
PMCPMC6849743
OpenAlexW2935444085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.