Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30937730›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2019

Comparison of generic and condition-specific oral health-related quality of life instruments in patients with oral submucous fibrosis.

Shailesh M Gondivkar, Rahul R Bhowate, Amol R Gadbail, Rima S Gondivkar, Sachin C Sarode, Gargi S Saode

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oral Submucous Fibrosis: Correlation of Clinical Grading to Various Habit Factors.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shailesh M GondivkarDepartment of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Government Dental College & Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440003, India. shailesh_gondivkar@yahoo.com.
Rahul R BhowateDepartment of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College & Hospital, DMIMS (DU), Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
Amol R GadbailDepartment of Dentistry, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College & Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Rima S GondivkarDental Surgeon, # 301, Aarti Regency, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Manewada Road, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Sachin C SarodeDepartment of Oral Pathology & Microbiology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Gargi S SaodeDepartment of Oral Pathology & Microbiology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWith the growing interest in health economics, there is a demand for best valid instrument to assess quality of life (QoL) in patients with oral submucous fibrosis (OSF). The objective of this study was to compare the convergent and discriminative properties of the condition-specific OHRQoL-OSF and generic OHIP-14 in OSF patients.

methodsThe OHRQoL-OSF and OHIP-14 instruments were administered concurrently to 300 clinically diagnosed OSF patients. Analysis of both the instruments was carried out by using descriptive statistics. The internal consistency and reproducibility of the instruments were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient respectively. The convergent and discriminative validity were then determined and compared.

resultsThe OHRQoL-OSF and OHIP-14 exhibited good psychometric properties for internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.88) and reproducibility (ICC > 0.85). A positive associations were observed between both the instruments, but a high prevalence of patients with no impact was noted using the OHIP-14. Both the instruments were able to discriminate between patients with different clinical stages of OSF, but OHRQoL-OSF was more responsive in the early stages of OSF. The OHRQoL-OSF demonstrated greater sensitivity for 'discomfort and functional impairment'.

conclusionsThe condition-specific OHRQoL-OSF identified OSF patients with impaired oral health-related QoL more easily with greater discriminative properties. To better understand patient reported experiences in OSF, these results may guide the choice of instrument in future researches and surveys.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOral HealthOral Submucous FibrosisPrevalencePsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultOHIP-14OHRQoL-OSFOral healthOral submucous fibrosisQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.