Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30937705›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2019

Emotional content impacts how executive function ability relates to willingness to wait and to work for reward.

Katherine S F Damme, Nicholas J Kelley, Meghan E Quinn, James E Glazer, Iris Ka-Yi Chat, Katherine S Young, Robin Nusslock, Richard Zinbarg, Susan Bookheimer, Michelle G Craske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reward systems, cognition, and emotion: Introduction to the special issue.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katherine S F DammeNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. Kate.Damme@u.northwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4260-1528
Nicholas J KelleyNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Meghan E QuinnNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
James E GlazerNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Iris Ka-Yi ChatNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Katherine S YoungUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Robin NusslockNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Richard ZinbargNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Susan BookheimerUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michelle G CraskeUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

LIFE-SPAN DEVELOPMENT OF NORMAL AND ABNORMAL BEHAVIORT32MH018921 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI HUMPHREYS, KATHRYN LEIGH · 1989 to 2024
$6.7M
Risk for Bipolar Disorder: Reward-related Brain Function & Social RhythmsR01MH077908 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI ALLOY, LAUREN BERSH · 2007 to 2017
$5.7M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN THE NEUROSCIENCE OF HUMAN COGNITIONT32NS047987 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Rodrigo M Braga, Christina Maria Zelano · 2006 to 2026
$5.6M
Symptom Dimension of Threat- and Reward-Related NeurocircuitryR01MH100117 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BOOKHEIMER, SUSAN Y, CRASKE, MICHELLE G · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077908NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100117NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018921NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS047987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that better value-based decision making (e.g., waiting or working for rewards) relates to greater executive function (EF) ability. However, EF is not a static ability, but is influenced by the emotional content of the task. As such, EF ability in emotional contexts may have unique associations with value-based decision making, in which costs and benefits are explicit. Participants (N = 229) completed an EF task (with both negative and neutral task conditions) and two value-based decision-making tasks. Willingness to wait and to work were evaluated in separate path models relating the waiting and working conditions to the EF conditions. Willingness to wait and willingness to work showed distinct relationships with EF ability: Greater EF ability on a negative, but not on a neutral, EF task was related to a willingness to wait for a reward, whereas greater EF ability across both EF tasks was related to a greater willingness to work for a reward. EF ability on a negative EF task showed an inverted-U relationship to willingness to wait for reward, and was most related to willingness to wait at a 6-month delay. Greater EF, regardless of whether the task was negative or neutral, was related to a greater willingness to work when reward was uncertain (50%) or was likely (88%), but not when reward was unlikely (12%). This study suggests that the emotional content of value-based decisions impacts the relationship between EF ability and willingness to wait or to work for reward.

Indexed as

RewardAdolescentAdultAptitudeChoice BehaviorDelay DiscountingExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultDDTDecision makingEEfRTEffort discountingExecutive functionN-backRewardTemporal discounting

Identifiers

PMID30937705
PMCPMC6599486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.