ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019
Exploring physicians, nurses and ward-based pharmacists working relationships in a Swedish inpatient setting: a mixed methods study.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impacts of Outsourcing Medication Repackaging in Nursing Homes: Quality and Areas of Pharmacy-Nursing Collaboration.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Performance, interpersonal relationships and professional satisfaction: determinants to support pharmaceutical reengineering.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Perceptions and expectations of health professionals regarding hospital pharmacy services and the roles of hospital pharmacists: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Review
- Understanding of healthcare professionals towards the roles and competencies of clinical pharmacists in South Africa.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Interprofessional collaboration within general practice teams following the inclusion of non-dispensing pharmacists.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2023Article
- Overcoming Barriers in Nurse-Pharmacist Collaborations on Wards - Qualitative Expert Interviews with Nurses and Pharmacists.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Nurse-Filled versus Pharmacy-Filled Medication Organization Devices-Survey on Current Practices and Views of Home Care Nursing Services.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effective Clinical Pathway Improves Interprofessional Collaboration and Reduces Antibiotics Prophylaxis Use in Orthopedic Surgery in Hospitals in Indonesia.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Public health interventions on prescription redemptions and secondary medication adherence among type 2 diabetes patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2021Review
- Evaluation of General Practice Pharmacists: Study Protocol to Assess Interprofessional Collaboration and Team Effectiveness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Medical professionalism research characteristics and hotspots: a 10-year bibliometric analysis of publications from 2010 to 2019.Scientometrics · 2021Article
- Clinical Impact of Nurses-Physicians Collaboration Intervention on the Treatment of Immune Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- Article
- Facilitators and barriers for performing comprehensive medication reviews and follow-up by multiprofessional teams in older hospitalised patients.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- "Interprofessional Collaboration" among Pharmacists, Physicians, and Nurses: A Hybrid Concept Analysis.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background In Sweden there has been limited work investigating the integration and nature of collaborative relationships between pharmacists and other healthcare practitioners. Objective To explore the working relationships of physicians, nurses and ward-based pharmacists in a rural hospital after the introduction of a clinical pharmacy service. Setting General medical ward in a rural hospital in northern Sweden. Method Mixed methods involving face-to-face semi-structured interviews with nurses, physicians and pharmacists, and a physician survey using the Physician-Pharmacist Collaboration Index to measure the extent of physician-reported collaborative working relationships. Main outcome measure Perceptions about collaborative working relationships between physician, nurses and pharmacists. Results All physicians (n = 9) who interacted with the clinical pharmacists completed the survey. The mean total score was 78.6 ± 4.7, total 92 (higher scores represent a more advanced relationship). Mean domain scores were highest for relationship initiation (13.0 ± 1.3, total 15), and trustworthiness (38.9 ± 3.4, total 42), followed by role specification (26.3 ± 2.6, total 30). The interviews (with nurses and physicians), showed how communication, collaboration and joint knowledge-exchange in the intervention changed and developed over time. Conclusion This study provides new insights into collaborative working relationships from the perspectives of physicians and nurses. The Physician-Pharmacist Collaboration Index scores suggest that physicians felt that clinical pharmacists were active in providing patient care; could be trusted to follow up on recommendations; and were credible. The interviews suggest that the team-based intervention provided good conditions for creating new ways to work to achieve commitment to professional working relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.