Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30937646›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2019

How to manage anal ulcerations and anorectal stenosis in Crohn's disease: algorithm-based decision making : French National Working Group Consensus 2018.

D Bouchard, C Brochard, B Vinson-Bonnet, G Staumont, L Abramowitz, P Benfredj, N Fathallah, J-L Faucheron, T Higuero, Y Panis and 4 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

D BouchardBagatelle Hospital, 203 route de Toulouse, 33401, Talence Cedex, France. proctobouc@gmail.com.
C BrochardUniversity Hospital Center, Rennes Cedex 9, France.
B Vinson-BonnetPoissy-Saint Germain en Laye Hospital, Poissy, France.
G StaumontLa Croix du Sud Clinic, Quint-Fonsegrives, France.
L AbramowitzRamsay Générale de Santé, Blomet Clinic, Paris, France.
P BenfredjSaint Joseph Hospital, Paris, France.
N FathallahSaint Joseph Hospital, Paris, France.
J-L FaucheronUniversity Hospital Center Grenoble-Alpes, La Tronche, France.
T Higuero, Beausoleil, France.
Y PanisBeaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.
V de ParadesSaint Joseph Hospital, Paris, France.
L SiproudhisUniversity Hospital Center, Rennes Cedex 9, France.
D LaharieUmniversity Hospital Center Haut Lévêque, Pessac Cedex, France.
F PigotBagatelle Hospital, 203 route de Toulouse, 33401, Talence Cedex, France.
Université de Rennes · FRCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy · FRGénérale de Santé · FRHôpital Beaujon · FRHôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The French National Society of Coloproctology established national recommendations for the treatment of anoperineal lesions associated with Crohn's disease. Treatment strategies for anal ulcerations and anorectal stenosis are suggested. Recommendations have been graded following international recommendations, and when absent professional agreement was established. For each situation, practical algorithms have been drawn.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnorectal MalformationsClinical Decision-MakingColorectal SurgeryConsensusCrohn DiseaseDisease ManagementFranceHumansProctocolitisAnal ulcerationsAnorectal stenosisCrohn’s diseaseTreatment

Identifiers

PMID30937646
OpenAlexW2933136292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.