Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30937628›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2019

Application of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Preliminary Study with Artificial Neural Networks.

Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard, Mohammad Taheri, Mir Davood Omrani, Amir Daaee, Hossein Mohammad-Rahimi, Hosein Kazazi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Association betweenBioMed research international · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Circadian rhythm lncRNABiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Sex-dependent prediction of autism.Frontiers in genetics · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Soudeh Ghafouri-FardDepartment of Medical Genetics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad TaheriUrogenital Stem Cell Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mohammad_823@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8381-0591
Mir Davood OmraniDepartment of Medical Genetics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. davood_omrani@yahoo.co.uk.
Amir DaaeeSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein Mohammad-RahimiDental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Hosein KazaziDental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) includes different neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by deficits in social communication, and restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests or activities. Based on the importance of early diagnosis for effective therapeutic intervention, several strategies have been employed for detection of the disorder. The artificial neural network (ANN) as a type of machine learning method is a common strategy. In the current study, we extracted genomic data for 487 ASD patients and 455 healthy individuals. All individuals were genotyped in certain single-nucleotide polymorphisms within retinoic acid-related orphan receptor alpha (RORA), gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor beta3 subunit (GABRB3), synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP25) and metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 (GRM7) genes. Subsequently, we used the "Keras" package to create and train the ANN model. For cross-validation, samples were divided into ten folds. In the training process, initially, the first fold was preserved for validation and the other folds were used to train the model. The validation fold was then used to evaluate model performance. The k-fold cross-validation method was used to ensure model generalizability and to prevent overfitting. Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) were applied to explain model predictions at the data sample level. The output of loss function was evaluated in the training process for each fold in the k-fold cross-validation model. Finally, the number of losses was reduced to less than 0.6 after 200 epochs (except in two cases). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of our model were 73.67%, 82.75% and 63.95%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 80.59. Consequently, in the current study, we propose an ANN-based method for differentiating ASD status from healthy status with adequate power.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAutism Spectrum DisorderChildFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMaleReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, Metabotropic GlutamateSensitivity and SpecificitySynaptosomal-Associated Protein 25GABRB3 protein, humanmetabotropic glutamate receptor 7Receptors, GABA-AReceptors, Metabotropic GlutamateSNAP25 protein, humanSynaptosomal-Associated Protein 25Artificial neural networkAutism spectrum disorderSingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.