Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30937617›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Correction to: Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment in diagnostic gastroscopy: nationwide evidence of validity and competency development during training.

Keith Siau, James Crossley, Paul Dunckley, Gavin Johnson, Mark Feeney, Neil D Hawkes, Ian L P Beales, Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG)

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04898803 (How Effective Can a Simulator-Based Training Course For Beginners In Endoscopy Be Made?), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04898803 completednot on this map

How Effective Can a Simulator-Based Training Course For Beginners In Endoscopy Be Made?

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2020 to 2022Enrolled32ConditionsPhysicians Gastroscopy TrainingArmsconventional DGVS training, extended simulator training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Keith SiauJoint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK. keith@siau.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1273-9561
James CrossleyAcademic Unit of Medical Education, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Paul DunckleyJoint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.
Gavin JohnsonJoint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.
Mark FeeneyJoint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.
Neil D HawkesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cwm Taf University Health Board, Llantrisant, UK.
Ian L P BealesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The citation for Reference 22 should be replaced with: Kumar NL, Kugener G, Perencevich ML, et al (2018) The SAFE-T assessment tool: derivation and validation of a web-based application for point-of-care evaluation of gastroenterology fellow performance in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 87(1):262-269.

Identifiers

PMID30937617
PMCPMC7050556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.