ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
Open Agile text mining for bioinformatics: the PubAnnotation ecosystem.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Resources for screening the literature for glycan-related terms using PubAnnotation in GlyCosmos.Glycobiology · 2026Article
- A curation system of rice trait ontology with reliable interoperation by LLM and PubAnnotation.Genomics & informatics · 2025Article
- Expanding the concept of ID conversion in TogoID by introducing multi-semantic and label features.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2025Article
- BioTextQuest v2.0: An evolved tool for biomedical literature mining and concept discovery.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Customizing GPT for natural language dialogue interface in database access.Genomics & informatics · 2024Article
- Lightweight technology stacks for assistive linked annotations.Genomics & informatics · 2024Article
- NetMe 2.0: a web-based platform for extracting and modeling knowledge from biomedical literature as a labeled graph.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Literature Mining of Disease Associated Noncoding RNA in the Omics Era.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Darling: A Web Application for Detecting Disease-Related Biomedical Entity Associations with Literature Mining.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- BioTAGME: A Comprehensive Platform for Biological Knowledge Network Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- NETME: on-the-fly knowledge network construction from biomedical literature.Applied network science · 2022Article
- Editor's introduction to the special section on the 7th Biomedical Linked Annotation Hackathon (BLAH7).Genomics & informatics · 2021Article
- LitCovid-AGAC: cellular and molecular level annotation data set based on COVID-19.Genomics & informatics · 2021Article
- Quantification of US Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval Statements for High-Risk Medical Devices With Pediatric Age Indications.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Using the PubAnnotation ecosystem to perform agile text mining on Genomics & Informatics: a tutorial review.Genomics & informatics · 2020Article
- Improving accessibility and distinction between negative results in biomedical relation extraction.Genomics & informatics · 2020Article
- Integration of the PubAnnotation ecosystem in the development of a web-based search tool for alternative methods.Genomics & informatics · 2020Article
- Quality Matters: Biocuration Experts on the Impact of Duplication and Other Data Quality Issues in Biological Databases.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
motivationMost currently available text mining tools share two characteristics that make them less than optimal for use by biomedical researchers: they require extensive specialist skills in natural language processing and they were built on the assumption that they should optimize global performance metrics on representative datasets. This is a problem because most end-users are not natural language processing specialists and because biomedical researchers often care less about global metrics like F-measure or representative datasets than they do about more granular metrics such as precision and recall on their own specialized datasets. Thus, there are fundamental mismatches between the assumptions of much text mining work and the preferences of potential end-users.
resultsThis article introduces the concept of Agile text mining, and presents the PubAnnotation ecosystem as an example implementation. The system approaches the problems from two perspectives: it allows the reformulation of text mining by biomedical researchers from the task of assembling a complete system to the task of retrieving warehoused annotations, and it makes it possible to do very targeted customization of the pre-existing system to address specific end-user requirements. Two use cases are presented: assisted curation of the GlycoEpitope database, and assessing coverage in the literature of pre-eclampsia-associated genes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The three tools that make up the ecosystem, PubAnnotation, PubDictionaries and TextAE are publicly available as web services, and also as open source projects. The dictionaries and the annotation datasets associated with the use cases are all publicly available through PubDictionaries and PubAnnotation, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.