ArticlePediatric quality & safety
A Project-based Curriculum for Driving Organization-wide Continuous Improvement.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishing a Multi-Institutional Quality and Patient Safety Consortium: Collaboration Across Affiliates in a Community-Based Medical School.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2020Article
- Increasing Academic Output through Quality Improvement Educational Strategies.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCreating the capacity and capability for meaningful improvement in healthcare quality is a challenge many organizations face. Before 2012, Children's Mercy sponsored 20 leaders to obtain advanced improvement training from peer organizations. Recognizing an opportunity to build upon this momentum, we developed an organization-wide curriculum for teaching continuous improvement.
methodsA steering committee was created in 2011 to define, advise, and oversee education in improvement science. We agreed upon a framework for improvement, a program name [Continuous Quality and Practice Improvement (CQPI)], and a phased curriculum development approach, beginning with a project/experiential learning based course (Team CQPI). Course evaluation for Team CQPI consisted of a standard evaluation of objectives, pre- and post-course assessment, qualitative feedback, and serial assessment of project progress using the Team Assessment Score (TAS). The curriculum committee monitored improvement.
resultsFrom 2012 to 2017, 297 people participated in the project-based course, completing a total of 83 projects. TAS improved throughout the 4-month project-based course, from an average starting score of 1 ("forming a team") to 2.7 ("changes tested"). The average TAS at 12 months following completion of the Team CQPI course was 3.5 ("improvement") out of 5.
conclusionsDevelopment of a comprehensive curriculum for driving continuous improvement has resulted in a measurable change in TAS scores representative of local improvement efforts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.