Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30937394›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction open2019

The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

V Q Dang, L N Vuong, T M Ho, A N Ha, Q N Nguyen, B T Truong, Q T Pham, R Wang, R J Norman, B W Mol

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03428919 (The Effectiveness of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Versus Conventional in Vitro Fertilization in Couples With Non-male Factor Infertility), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03428919 nacompletednot on this map

The Effectiveness of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Versus Conventional in Vitro Fertilization in Couples With Non-male Factor Infertility: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMỹ Đức HospitalRan2018 to 2020Enrolled1,064ConditionsInfertilityArmsICSI, IVF
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. ICSI for non-male factor: do we practice what we preach?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

V Q DangIVFMD, My Duc Hospital, 4 Nui Thanh, Tan Binh District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-5205-8210
L N VuongHOPE Research Center, My Duc Hospital, 4 Nui Thanh, Tan Binh District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-6529-6912
T M HoHOPE Research Center, My Duc Hospital, 4 Nui Thanh, Tan Binh District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
A N HaIVFMD, My Duc Hospital, 4 Nui Thanh, Tan Binh District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Q N NguyenIVFMD, My Duc Hospital, 4 Nui Thanh, Tan Binh District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
B T TruongIVFAS, An Sinh Hospital, 10 Tran Huy Lieu, Phu Nhuan District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Q T PhamIVFMD, My Duc Hospital, 4 Nui Thanh, Tan Binh District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
R WangDiscipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Ground Floor, 55 King William Road, North Adelaide SA 5006 Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6622-8134
R J NormanDiscipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Ground Floor, 55 King William Road, North Adelaide SA 5006 Adelaide, Australia.
B W MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Monash University, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionsDoes ICSI result in a higher live birth rate as compared with conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility? WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ICSI is primarily indicated for severe male factor infertility. While the use of ICSI for couples with non-male factor infertility has been increasing worldwide, this is not supported by data from randomised controlled trials. Evidence from non-randomised studies suggest no benefit from ICSI compared with conventional IVF in non-male factor infertility, if not a harm. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This randomised, open-label, multi-centre trial aims to compare the effectiveness of one ICSI cycle and one conventional IVF cycle in infertile couples with non-male factor infertility. A total of 1064 couples will be randomly allocated to an ICSI group and a conventional IVF group. The estimated duration of the study is 30 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsEligible couples are those whose husbands' total sperm count and motility are normal, have undergone ≤2 previous IVF/ICSI attempts, use antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation, agree to have ≤2 embryos transferred and are not participating in another IVF study at the same time. Women undergoing IVM cycles, using frozen semen or having a poor fertilisation (≤25%) in previous cycle will not be eligible. Couples will be randomised to undergo ICSI or conventional IVF (1:1) with ongoing pregnancy resulting in live birth after the first embryo transfer of the started treatment cycle as the primary endpoint. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Effect sizes will be summarised as relative risk (RR), with precision evaluated by 95% CIs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: All authors declare having no conflict of interests with regards to this trial. This work was supported by a grant from MSD [MISP #57508]. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03428919. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 8 February 2018. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 16 March 2018.

Indexed as

ICSIIVFnon-male factor infertilityrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID30937394
PMCPMC6436611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.