Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30937146›Full record

ArticleKansas journal of medicine2018

Maternal Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Concerning Interpregnancy Interval.

Carolyn R Ahlers-Schmidt, Nikki Keene Woods, Danielle Bradshaw, Anna Rempel, Matt Engel, Mary Benton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kansas journal of medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carolyn R Ahlers-SchmidtUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Pediatrics, Wichita, KS.
Nikki Keene WoodsWichita State University, Department of Public Health Sciences, Wichita, KS.
Danielle BradshawUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Pediatrics, Wichita, KS.
Anna RempelUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Pediatrics, Wichita, KS.
Matt EngelUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Pediatrics, Wichita, KS.
Mary BentonUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Pediatrics, Wichita, KS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFew studies have examined maternal intentions and practices related to interpregnancy interval (IPI). IPI less than 18 months has been linked to increased preterm birth and infant mortality. This manuscript reports on a cross-sectional survey of mothers conducted to understand maternal knowledge, attitudes, and practice of IPI in Sedgwick County, Kansas.

methodsNew and expectant mothers and mothers of neonatal infant care unit (NICU) graduates (n = 125) were surveyed regarding the issues surrounding IPI. Front desk staff handed out self-administered surveys, which were returned to a nurse upon completion. NICU participants were emailed a link to the survey hosted on SurveyMonkey

resultsFewer than 30% of mothers reported previously receiving information about IPI from any source. When asked about risks associated with IPI, women frequently (n = 58, 45%) identified increased risk for birth outcomes with no known association with short IPI. Findings regarding maternal attitudes surrounding optimal IPI were mixed with many mothers defining ideal IPI as less than 18 months (n = 52, 42%), while broadly reporting they believed that a woman's body needs time to heal between pregnancies. Respondents from the NICU sample generally reported shorter optimal IPI values than the other participants. When IPI was estimated from participants' past pregnancies, half of IPIs were less than 18 months. Mothers reported they favored healthcare providers as a source for IPI education. Face-to-face discussions or printed materials were the preferred modes of education.

conclusionsWomen were aware of the need for spacing between pregnancies, however, that knowledge was unassociated with past behavior. These findings should be taken into consideration when formulating future interventions.

Indexed as

birth intervalsinfant mortalitymaternal-child health servicespregnancyreproductive history

Identifiers

PMID30937146
PMCPMC6276970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.