ReviewJournal of clinical medicine research2019
Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter Use and Related Infections in Clinical Practice: A Literature Update.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk factors for neonatal catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection associated with midline catheters compared with peripherally inserted central catheters: A meta-analysis.Nursing open · 2021Pooled it
- Bedside peripherally inserted central catheter placement in trauma intensive care unit in South Korea: a comparative analysis of safety and tip positioning accuracy.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
- Article
- Effectiveness of a nurse-led peripherally inserted central catheter service: A retrospective cohort study.The journal of vascular access · 2025Article
- Investigation of the effects of types of catheters on bloodstream infection in patients with major burns: prognosis and prediction using procalcitonin.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2025Article
- Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter-Related Complications in Adult Patients with Haematological Malignancy.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2024Article
- Article
- Clinical factors associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) related bloodstream infections: a single centre retrospective cohort.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2023Article
- A modified method for measuring the length of peripherally inserted central catheters to reduce the risk of malposition during catheter insertion.SAGE open medicine · 2023Article
- Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Infectious Myositis: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2022Article
- Risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheterization-associated bloodstream infection in neonates.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) lines are commonly used by clinicians in daily practice. This strategy has been established the latest years as a common approach in many clinical conditions. Apart from their usefulness, PICC use is related to some complications. Aim of this review is to summarize all relevant publications regarding the PICC-related infection, as sepsis remains a high mortality syndrome. We conducted a PubMed search to identify all relevant publications referring to infective complications after insertion and use of PICC lines in hospitalized adult patients. A great number of publications suggest that PICC lines are widely used in the management of patients. The use of peripheral inserted central lines is related with a few complications, including bloodstream infections. Existing data mainly support their use in specific clinical conditions because of the low infectious rates. Some conflicting data also exist regarding PICC use, due to an unclear benefit from their use compared to other commonly used strategies. Although a number of complications, including bloodstream infections are related with insertion of PICC lines, their use has a promising role and can be used when indicated in a wide variety of clinical conditions, especially in specific categories of patients and prolonged periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.