ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Constructing differential co-expression network to predict key pathways for myocardial infarction.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of the differences in immune-related genes and immune cell subtypes in acute myocardial infarction.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2024Article
- Biodata Mining of Differentially Expressed Genes between Acute Myocardial Infarction and Unstable Angina Based on Integrated Bioinformatics.BioMed research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New thoughts are warranted to develop efficient diagnosis and optimal therapeutics to combat unstable angina (UA)/myocardial infarction (MI). Therefore, the gene data of patients with UA or MI were used in this study to identify the optimal pathways which can provide comprehensive information for UA/MI development. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between UA and MI were detected using LIMMA package, and pathway enrichment analysis was conducted for the DEGs, based on the DAVID tool, to detect the significant pathways. Then, differential co-expression network (DCN) and sub-DCN for the DEGs were constructed. Subsequently, informative pathways were extracted using guilt-by-association (GBA) principle relying on the area under the curve (AUC), and the pathway categories with AUC >0.8 were defined as the informative pathways. Finally, we selected the optimal pathways based on the traditional pathway analysis and the sub-DCN-based-GBA pathway prediction method. A total of 203 and 266 DEGs were identified from the expression profile of blood of MI samples comparing with UAs in the time-point 1 and time-point 2 groups. Moreover, 7 and 10 informative pathway terms were identified based on AUC>0.8. Significantly, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, as well as MAPK signaling pathway were the common optimal pathways in the two groups. Calcium signaling pathway was unique to the whole blood of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) taken at 30 days post-ACS. In conclusion, the optimal pathways (MAPK signaling pathway, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, and calcium signaling pathway) might play important roles in the progression of UA/MI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.