ArticleJournal of pain research2019
Activation of hippocampal microglia in a murine model of cancer-induced pain.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral Glutamate Alterations Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging in a Rat Model of Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Sepsis.Metabolites · 2023Article
- PRG-1 relieves pain and depressive-like behaviors in rats of bone cancer pain by regulation of dendritic spine in hippocampus.International journal of biological sciences · 2021Article
- Animal Models of Cancer-Related Pain: Current Perspectives in Translation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Article
- Nanoparticulate MgHMolecular painArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPain is a common and debilitating comorbidity of metastatic breast cancer. The hippocampus has been implicated in nociceptive processing, particularly relating to the subjective aspect of pain. Here, a syngeneic mouse model was used to characterize the effects of peripheral tumors on hippocampal microglial activation in relation to cancer-induced pain (CIP). MATERIALS AND
methodsMice were systemically treated with the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor Pexidartinib prior to intrafemoral (IF) or subcutaneous 4T1 carcinoma cell inoculation. Spontaneous and evoked nociceptive responses were quantitated throughout tumor development, and contralateral hippocampi were collected via endpoint microdissection for RNA analysis. Additionally, IF tumor-bearing animals were sacrificed on days 5, 10, 15, and 20 post 4T1 cell inoculation, and brain sections were immunofluorescently stained for Iba1, a marker of activated microglia.
resultsAblation of these neuroimmune cells with the CSF1R inhibitor Pexidartinib delayed the onset and severity of cancer-induced nociceptive behaviors in IF tumor-bearing animals, adding to the body of literature that demonstrates microglial contribution to the development and maintenance of CIP. Furthermore, in untreated IF tumor-bearing mice, nociceptive behaviors appeared to progress in parallel with microglial activation in hippocampal regions. Immunofluorescent Iba1+ microglia increased in the dentate gyrus and cornu ammonis 1 hippocampal regions in IF tumor-bearing animals over time, which was confirmed at the mRNA level using relevant microglial markers.
conclusionThis is the first experimental evidence to demonstrate the effects of peripheral tumor-induced nociception on hippocampal microglial activation. The increase in hippocampal microglia observed in the present study may reflect the emotional and cognitive deficits reported by patients with CIP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.