ArticleInfection and drug resistance2019
Risk factors with the development of infection with tigecycline- and carbapenem-resistant
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Analysis of Tigecycline Resistance in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in Mthatha and Surrounding Hospitals.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Risk factors and molecular characterization of carbapenem resistant Escherichia coli recovered from a tertiary hospital in Fujian, China from 2021 to 2023.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Genomic and clinical characteristics of carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2020Article
- In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Vanillic Acid against Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Bioactive Ingredients in Chinese Herbal Medicines That Target Non-coding RNAs: Promising New Choices for Disease Treatment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTigecycline is regarded as a last resort treatment for carbapenem-resistant PATIENTS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective case-case-control study of hospitalized patients with TCREC infection during the period 2012-2016 in Chongqing, China. Case patients with TCREC and those with CREC were compared to a control group with no
resultsA total of 36 TCREC cases, 36 CREC cases, and 100 controls were enrolled in our study. Multivariable analysis indicated that nasal catheter (OR: 8.9; 95% CI: 1.1-75.2), exposure to penicillin (OR: 95.9; 95% CI: 8.9-1038.3), aminoglycosides (OR: 42.1; 95% CI: 2.1-830.6), and fluoroquinolones (OR: 18.6; 95% CI: 1.9-185.6) were independent predictors for acquiring TCREC. In addition, venous catheterization (OR: 12.2; 95% CI: 2.5-58.5), penicillin (OR: 30.8; 95% CI: 7.9-120.0), and broad-spectrum cephalosporin (OR: 5.0; 95% CI: 1.5-17.3) were independently associated with CREC acquisition.
conclusionReasonable antibiotic stewardship programs and surveillance are necessary to control the tigecycline resistance among high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.