Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30936564›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2019

An open resource for accurately benchmarking small variant and reference calls.

Justin M Zook, Jennifer McDaniel, Nathan D Olson, Justin Wagner, Hemang Parikh, Haynes Heaton, Sean A Irvine, Len Trigg, Rebecca Truty, Cory Y McLean and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 219 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
219citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

219 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Scalable Framework for Comprehensive Typing of Polymorphic Immune Genes from Long-Read Data.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article

159 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Justin M ZookMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. jzook@nist.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2309-8402
Jennifer McDanielMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Nathan D OlsonMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Justin WagnerMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Hemang ParikhMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Haynes Heaton10x Genomics, Pleasanton, CA, USA.
Sean A IrvineReal Time Genomics, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Len TriggReal Time Genomics, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Rebecca TrutyInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Cory Y McLeanVerily Life Sciences, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Francisco M De La VegaDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9228-2097
Chunlin XiaoNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Stephen SherryNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Marc SalitMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1624-5195

Funding

National Biomedical Information ServicesZIHLM200888 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI PALTOO, DINA · 2009 to 2025
$5200.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 LM999999Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benchmark small variant calls are required for developing, optimizing and assessing the performance of sequencing and bioinformatics methods. Here, as part of the Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) Consortium, we apply a reproducible, cloud-based pipeline to integrate multiple short- and linked-read sequencing datasets and provide benchmark calls for human genomes. We generate benchmark calls for one previously analyzed GIAB sample, as well as six genomes from the Personal Genome Project. These new genomes have broad, open consent, making this a 'first of its kind' resource that is available to the community for multiple downstream applications. We produce 17% more benchmark single nucleotide variations, 176% more indels and 12% larger benchmark regions than previously published GIAB benchmarks. We demonstrate that this benchmark reliably identifies errors in existing callsets and highlight challenges in interpreting performance metrics when using benchmarks that are not perfect or comprehensive. Finally, we identify strengths and weaknesses of callsets by stratifying performance according to variant type and genome context.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingComputational BiologyGenetic VariationGenome, HumanGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansINDEL MutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSoftware

Identifiers

PMID30936564
PMCPMC6500473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.