Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30936435›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2019

Dynamic evolutionary history and gene content of sex chromosomes across diverse songbirds.

Luohao Xu, Gabriel Auer, Valentina Peona, Alexander Suh, Yuan Deng, Shaohong Feng, Guojie Zhang, Mozes P K Blom, Les Christidis, Stefan Prost and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Genomic origins and evolution of neo-sex chromosomes in Pacific Island birds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Exciting times for evolutionary biology.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Luohao XuMOE Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Gabriel AuerDepartment of Molecular Evolution and Development, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Valentina PeonaDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5119-1837
Alexander SuhDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Yuan DengChina National Genebank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Shaohong FengChina National Genebank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Guojie ZhangChina National Genebank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6860-1521
Mozes P K BlomDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.
Les ChristidisNational Marin Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia.
Stefan ProstDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Martin IrestedtDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden. Martin.Irestedt@nrm.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1680-6861
Qi ZhouMOE Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. zhouqi1982@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7419-2047
University of Vienna · ATBGI Group (China) · CNUppsala University · SELOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics · DEMuseum für Naturkunde · DESwedish Museum of Natural History · SEThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Songbirds have a species number close to that of mammals and are classic models for studying speciation and sexual selection. Sex chromosomes are hotspots of both processes, yet their evolutionary history in songbirds remains unclear. We characterized genomes of 11 songbird species, with 5 genomes of bird-of-paradise species. We conclude that songbird sex chromosomes have undergone four periods of recombination suppression before species radiation, producing a gradient of pairwise sequence divergence termed 'evolutionary strata'. The latest stratum was probably due to a songbird-specific burst of retrotransposon CR1-E1 elements at its boundary, instead of the chromosome inversion generally assumed for suppressing sex-linked recombination. The formation of evolutionary strata has reshaped the genomic architecture of both sex chromosomes. We find stepwise variations of Z-linked inversions, repeat and guanine-cytosine (GC) contents, as well as W-linked gene loss rate associated with the age of strata. A few W-linked genes have been preserved for their essential functions, indicated by higher and broader expression of lizard orthologues compared with those of other sex-linked genes. We also find a different degree of accelerated evolution of Z-linked genes versus autosomal genes among species, potentially reflecting diversified intensity of sexual selection. Our results uncover the dynamic evolutionary history of songbird sex chromosomes and provide insights into the mechanisms of recombination suppression.

Indexed as

SongbirdsAnimalsBase CompositionEvolution, MolecularGenomeSex Chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID30936435
OpenAlexW2898266286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.