Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30936390›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2020

Have e-cigarettes renormalised or displaced youth smoking? Results of a segmented regression analysis of repeated cross sectional survey data in England, Scotland and Wales.

Britt Hallingberg, Olivia M Maynard, Linda Bauld, Rachel Brown, Linsay Gray, Emily Lowthian, Anne-Marie MacKintosh, Laurence Moore, Marcus R Munafo, Graham Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trends in Social Norms Toward Cigarette Smoking and E-cigarette Use Among U.S. Youth Between 2015 and 2021.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Inhibition of Circadian Rhythm GeneEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Britt HallingbergCentre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8016-5793
Olivia M MaynardSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Linda BauldUsher Institute and UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Rachel BrownCentre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Linsay GrayMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Emily LowthianCentre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Anne-Marie MacKintoshCentre for Tobacco Control Research, Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Laurence MooreMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Marcus R MunafoSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Graham MooreCentre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 20456Chief Scientist Office SPHSU13Chief Scientist Office SPHSU14Chief Scientist Office SPHSU17Department of Health PHR/16/57/01Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/J013498/1Medical Research Council MC_EX_UU_MR/J013498/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/7Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/13Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/14Medical Research Council MR/J013498/1Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Medical Research Council MR/L002787/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine whether during a period of limited e-cigarette regulation and rapid growth in their use, smoking began to become renormalised among young people.

designInterrupted time-series analysis of repeated cross-sectional time-series data.

settingGreat Britain

participants248 324 young people aged approximately 13 and 15 years, from three national surveys during the years 1998-2015.

interventionUnregulated growth of e-cigarette use (following the year 2010, until 2015). OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were prevalence of self-reported ever smoking and regular smoking. Secondary outcomes were attitudes towards smoking. Tertiary outcomes were ever use of cannabis and alcohol.

resultsIn final models, no significant change was detected in the pre-existing trend for ever smoking (OR 1.01, CI 0.99 to 1.03). There was a marginally significant slowing in the rate of decline for regular smoking (OR 1.04, CI 1.00 to 1.08), accompanied by a larger slowing in the rate of decline of cannabis use (OR 1.21, CI 1.18 to 1.25) and alcohol use (OR 1.17, CI 1.14 to 1.19). In all models and subgroup analyses for smoking attitudes, an increased rate of decline was observed after 2010 (OR 0.88, CI 0.86 to 0.90). Models were robust to sensitivity analyses.

conclusionsThere was a marginal slowing in the decline in regular smoking during the period following 2010, when e-cigarettes were emerging but relatively unregulated. However, these patterns were not unique to tobacco use and the decline in the acceptability of smoking behaviour among youth accelerated during this time. These analyses provide little evidence that renormalisation of youth smoking was occurring during a period of rapid growth and limited regulation of e-cigarettes from 2011 to 2015. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Research registry number: researchregistry4336.

Indexed as

AdolescentAlcohol DrinkingCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsEnglandFemaleHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMaleMarijuana UsePrevalenceRegression AnalysisScotlandSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco SmokingVapingdenormalizationelectronic nicotine delivery devicesharm reductionpublic policy

Identifiers

PMID30936390
PMCPMC7036293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.