Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30936104›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2019

Ceftriaxone and Cefotaxime Have Similar Effects on the Intestinal Microbiota in Human Volunteers Treated by Standard-Dose Regimens.

Charles Burdet, Nathalie Grall, Morgane Linard, Antoine Bridier-Nahmias, Michèle Benhayoun, Khadija Bourabha, Mélanie Magnan, Olivier Clermont, Camille d'Humières, Olivier Tenaillon and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antibiotic perturbations to the gut microbiome.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charles BurdetINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France charles.burdet@inserm.fr.
Nathalie GrallINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Morgane LinardAP-HP, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistic and Clinical Research, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France.
Antoine Bridier-NahmiasINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0376-6840
Michèle BenhayounINSERM Clinical Investigation Center 1425, Paris, France.
Khadija BourabhaINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Mélanie MagnanINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Olivier ClermontINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Camille d'HumièresINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Olivier TenaillonINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Erick DenamurINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Laurent MassiasINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Sarah TubianaINSERM Clinical Investigation Center 1425, Paris, France.
Loubna AlavoineINSERM Clinical Investigation Center 1425, Paris, France.
Antoine AndremontINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
France MentréINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Xavier DuvalINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
CEREMI Group
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ceftriaxone has a higher biliary elimination than cefotaxime (40% versus 10%), which may result in a more pronounced impact on the intestinal microbiota. We performed a monocenter, randomized open-label clinical trial in 22 healthy volunteers treated by intravenous ceftriaxone (1 g/24 h) or cefotaxime (1 g/8 h) for 3 days. We collected fecal samples for phenotypic analyses, 16S rRNA gene profiling, and measurement of the antibiotic concentration and compared the groups for the evolution of microbial counts and indices of bacterial diversity over time. Plasma samples were drawn at day 3 for pharmacokinetic analysis. The emergence of 3rd-generation-cephalosporin-resistant Gram-negative enteric bacilli (

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotaximeCeftriaxoneCephalosporinsFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotaximeCeftriaxoneCephalosporinsRNA, Ribosomal, 16Scefotaximeceftriaxoneintestinal microbiotametagenomicspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID30936104
PMCPMC6535507
OpenAlexW2934438271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.