Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30935872›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology2019

Fully closed-loop insulin delivery in inpatients receiving nutritional support: a two-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Charlotte K Boughton, Lia Bally, Franco Martignoni, Sara Hartnell, David Herzig, Andreas Vogt, Maria M Wertli, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Mark L Evans, Anthony P Coll and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01774565 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomised Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Automated Closed-loop Glucose Control in Insulin Treated Type 2 Diabetes (Phase 1), Inpatient Hyperglycaemia Requiring Subcutaneous Insulin Therapy (Phase 2 and Phase 3) and to Evaluate Use of Closed-loop Applying Faster Insulin Aspart Versus Standard Insulin Aspart (Phase 4)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CambridgeRan2016 to 2018Enrolled43ConditionsDiabetes MellitusArmsFully Automated Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery, Conventional insulin therapy
NCT07645079 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Inpatient Diabetes Management With Automated Insulin Delivery Systems Compared to Multiple Daily Injections With a Basal-bolus Regimen - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSteno Diabetes Center CopenhagenRan2026 to 2027Enrolled92ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus Type 2, Infection, CGMArmsautomated insulin delivery system, GlucoTab, Control-arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Closed-loop insulin delivery in end-of-life care: a case report.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2019
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Inpatient Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Group-based trajectory modeling identifies distinct glycemic patterns predictive of mortality in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Metabolic Models, in Silico Trials, and Algorithms.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
  16. Early Stages of Automated Insulin Delivery.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
  17. Early Stages of Automated Insulin Delivery.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  18. Metabolic Models, in Silico Trials, and Algorithms.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte K BoughtonWellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Lia BallyDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Franco MartignoniDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Sara HartnellWolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
David HerzigDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Andreas VogtDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Maria M WertliDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Malgorzata E WilinskaWellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Mark L EvansWellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Anthony P CollWellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Christoph StettlerDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Roman HovorkaWellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: rh347@cam.ac.uk.
University Hospital of Bern · CHCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBMedical Research Council · GBWellcome/MRC Institute of Metabolic Science · GBWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlucose management is challenging in patients who require nutritional support in hospital. We aimed to assess whether fully closed-loop insulin delivery would improve glycaemic control compared with conventional subcutaneous insulin therapy in inpatients receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition or both.

methodsWe did a two-centre (UK and Switzerland), open-label, randomised controlled trial in adult inpatients receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition (or both) who required subcutaneous insulin therapy. Patients recruited from non-critical care surgical and medical wards were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated minimisation schedule (stratified by type of nutritional support [parenteral nutrition on or off] and pre-study total daily insulin dose [<50 or ≥50 units]) to receive fully closed-loop insulin delivery with faster-acting insulin aspart (closed-loop group) or conventional subcutaneous insulin therapy (control group) given in accordance with local clinical practice. Continuous glucose monitoring in the control group was masked to patients, ward staff, and investigators. Patients were followed up for a maximum of 15 days or until hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was the proportion of time that sensor glucose concentration was in target range (5·6-10·0 mmol/L), assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01774565.

findingsBetween Feb 8, 2018, and Sept 21, 2018, 90 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 43 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the closed-loop group (n=21) or the control group (n=22). The proportion of time that sensor glucose was in the target range was 68·4% [SD 15·5] in the closed-loop group and 36·4% [26·6] in the control group (difference 32·0 percentage points [95% CI 18·5-45·5; p<0·0001]). One serious adverse event occurred in each group (one cardiac arrest in the control group and one episode of acute respiratory failure in the closed-loop group), both of which were unrelated to study interventions. There were no adverse events related to study interventions in either group. No episodes of severe hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia with ketonaemia occurred in either study group.

interpretationClosed-loop insulin delivery is an effective treatment option to improve glycaemic control in patients receiving nutritional support in hospital.

fundingDiabetes UK, Swiss National Science Foundation, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust, and European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes.

Indexed as

Insulin Infusion SystemsNutrition TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringFemaleHospitalizationHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaInpatientsInsulinMaleMiddle AgedSwitzerlandBlood GlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID30935872
PMCPMC6467839
OpenAlexW2934288869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.