Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30935392›Full record

ArticleHead & face medicine2019

Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of palatal bone height for insertion of orthodontic implants - a retrospective CBCT study.

Sachin Chhatwani, Viola Rose-Zierau, Bassel Haddad, Mohammed Almuzian, Christian Kirschneck, Gholamreza Danesh

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head & face medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Significance of bone morphology and quality on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants: in vitro comparison between human bone substitute and artificial bone.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sachin ChhatwaniDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Witten/Herdecke, Dental Clinic, Alfred-Herrhausen Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany. sachin.chhatwani@uni-wh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6485-0392
Viola Rose-ZierauViola Rose-Zierau, Private Practice, Nelkenstr. 2, 44289, Dortmund, Germany.
Bassel HaddadDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Witten/Herdecke, Dental Clinic, Alfred-Herrhausen Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany.
Mohammed AlmuzianGlasgow Dental Academy, Edinburgh, UK, Department of Orthodontics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Christian KirschneckDepartment of Orthodontics, University Medical Centre of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Gholamreza DaneshDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Witten/Herdecke, Dental Clinic, Alfred-Herrhausen Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany.
Witten/Herdecke University · DEThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrthodontic implants have found widespread use as means of maximum skeletal anchorage in fixed orthodontic treatment, their optimal insertion location in the hard palate, however, is still controversial. The aim of this study was therefore to assess mean bone height across the hard palate and possible age- and sex related differences to identify the most favourable location according to maximum bone height, optimizing primary stability and survival of inserted orthodontic implants.

methodsIn this retrospective cross-sectional study, maxillary pretreatment CBCT scans of 180 healthy orthodontic patients (95♀, 85♂, age 8-40 years) were analysed with regard to vertical palatal bone height in the midpalatal area at 88 validated points distanced 2 mm from each other forming a grid of 0-14 mm posterior to the incisive foramen and 10 mm lateral of the midpalatal suture. Differences in bone height regarding sex and topographical location were assessed by three-way ANOVA.

resultsIn general, the midpalatal suture as well as the anterior-lateral palatal region showed distinctly higher mean palatal bone height with its maximum 4 mm posterior of the incisive foramen, whereas bone height was limited at the posterior region of the midpalatal suture. Women generally had significantly decreased palatal bone height compared to men at all measurement points. Higher age was associated with a decrease of bone height in the anterior and posterior lateral palatal region and the median palatal raphe with significant age differences.

conclusionsThe midpalatal suture as well as the anterior lateral palate seem to be most suitable for the insertion of orthodontic implants. Palatal bone height, however, was found to be sex- and age-specific, thus sex- and age-related differences should be taken into account, particularly regarding implant length. The ideal insertion site in the palate with sufficient bone height for orthodontic implants is 0-8 mm (men) or 0-6 mm (women) posterior to the incisive foramen and 10 mm lateral to the midpalatal suture. TRIAL REGISTRAION: This study has been registered and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany (12/2016).

Indexed as

Orthodontic Anchorage ProceduresPalate, HardSpiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBone heightCBCTOrthodontic implantPalatal insertionSkeletal anchorage

Identifiers

PMID30935392
PMCPMC6442434
OpenAlexW2935746386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.