Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30935214›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2019

Testing the Effectiveness of Implementing a Model of Mental Healthcare Involving Trained Lay Health Workers in Treating Major Mental Disorders Among Youth in a Conflict-Ridden, Low-Middle Income Environment: Part II Results.

Ashok Malla, Mushtaq Margoob, Srividya Iyer, Abdul Majid, Shalini Lal, Ridha Joober, Bilal Issaoui Mansouri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashok Malla1 Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Mushtaq Margoob3 Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences Studies Research Centre, Islamic University of Science and Technology, Awantipore, Kashmir, India.
Srividya Iyer1 Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abdul Majid7 Department of Psychiatry, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences Medical College, Srinagar, Kashmir, India.
Shalini Lal8 School of Rehabilitation, CHUM Research Center, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ridha Joober1 Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Bilal Issaoui Mansouri6 Douglas Hospital Research Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4060-5739

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo report the outcomes of young people (aged 14-30 years) treated for major mental disorders in a lay health worker (LHW) intervention model in a rural district of conflict-ridden Kashmir, India.

methodsOver a 12-month follow-up, LHWs collected data on symptoms, functioning, quality of life and disability, and patients' and families' service engagement and satisfaction.

resultsForty trained LHWs (18 males and 22 females) identified 262 individuals who met the criteria for a diagnosis of a major mental disorder, connected them with specialists for treatment initiation (within 14 days), and provided follow-up and support to patients and families. Significantly more patients (14-30 years) were identified during the 14 months of the project than those in all age groups in the preceding 2 years. At 12 months, 205 patients (78%) remained engaged with the service and perceived it as very helpful. Repeated measures ANOVA showed significant improvements in scores on the global assessment of functioning (GAF) scale (F[df, 3.449] = 104.729, DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsOur results show that an LHW-based service model, implemented in a rural setting of a low-to-middle income region plagued by long-term conflict, benefits young people with major mental disorders. We discuss the implications of our findings in the context of similar environments and the challenges encountered.

Indexed as

Models, OrganizationalOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareRural PopulationAdolescentAdultArmed ConflictsCommunity Health WorkersDeveloping CountriesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesYoung Adultcase identificationearly interventionglobal mental healthindiakashmirlay health workerlow- and middle-income countriesstakeholder engagementtechnology in low- and middle-income countriesyouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID30935214
PMCPMC6699027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.