Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30935070›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

A Multi-Feature Search Window Method for Road Boundary Detection Based on LIDAR Data.

Kai Li, Jinju Shao, Dong Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kai LiSchool of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, Shandong 255000, China. likai_academic@163.com.
Jinju Shao
Dong Guo

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51508315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to improve the accuracy of structured road boundary detection and solve the problem of the poor robustness of single feature boundary extraction, this paper proposes a multi-feature road boundary detection algorithm based on HDL-32E LIDAR. According to the road environment and sensor information, the former scenic cloud data is extracted, and the primary and secondary search windows are set according to the road geometric features and the point cloud spatial distribution features. In the search process, we propose the concept of the largest and smallest cluster points set and a two-way search method. Finally, the quadratic curve model is used to fit the road boundary. In the actual road test in the campus road, the accuracy of the linear boundary detection is 97.54%, the accuracy of the curve boundary detection is 92.56%, and the average detection period is 41.8 ms. In addition, the algorithm is still robust in a typical complex road environment.

Indexed as

boundary detectionLIDAR point cloudmulti-feature extractionstructured road

Identifiers

PMID30935070
PMCPMC6479466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.