Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30935031›Full record

ReviewNutrients2019

Osteosarcopenic Obesity: Current Knowledge, Revised Identification Criteria and Treatment Principles.

Owen J Kelly, Jennifer C Gilman, Dario Boschiero, Jasminka Z Ilich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Owen J KellyAbbott Nutrition, Columbus, OH 43215, USA. drojkelly@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5137-7316
Jennifer C GilmanAbbott Nutrition, Columbus, OH 43215, USA. jennifer.gilman@abbott.com.
Dario BoschieroBioTekna®, 30020 Marcon-Venice, Italy. dario.boschiero@biotekna.com.
Jasminka Z IlichInstitute for Successful Longevity, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA. jilichernst@fsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2426-8584

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcopenic obesity (OSO) syndrome describes the simultaneous deterioration of bone, muscle and excess fat, resulting in reduced functionality and systemic metabolic dysregulation. The key component contributing to this may be ectopic fat in the viscera, bone and muscle. OSO research to date is summarized, and the revised criteria for its identification for research purposes are reviewed and proposed, including new criteria to assess visceral fat in males and females. Finally, nutritional and physical activity recommendations are consolidated into a treatment algorithm, which can be validated in future studies and which may also be applied to preventative management.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlgorithmsBone Diseases, MetabolicCombined Modality TherapyDiet TherapyExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityOsteoporosisSarcopeniaexercisenutritionosteosarcopenic obesitytreatmentvisceral fat

Identifiers

PMID30935031
PMCPMC6520721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.