ArticleBiosensors2019
Article in Biosensors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Illuminating glioma surgery: A meta-analysis of Raman spectroscopy for intraoperative decision-making.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Raman-based machine-learning platform reveals unique metabolic differences between IDHmut and IDHwt glioma.Neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- In situ brain tumor detection using a Raman spectroscopy system-results of a multicenter study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine Learning-Assisted Classification of Paraffin-Embedded Brain Tumors with Raman Spectroscopy.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Current Trends of Raman Spectroscopy in Clinic Settings: Opportunities and Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Advances in Diagnostic Tools and Therapeutic Approaches for Gliomas: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Translating Biospectroscopy Techniques to Clinical Settings: A New Paradigm in Point-of-Care Screening and/or Diagnostics.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Intraoperative Imaging and Optical Visualization Techniques for Brain Tumor Resection: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- Raman Spectroscopy on Brain Disorders: Transition from Fundamental Research to Clinical Applications.Biosensors · 2022Review
- From Research to Diagnostic Application of Raman Spectroscopy in Neurosciences: Past and Perspectives.Free neuropathology · 2022Article
- Establishing spectrochemical changes in the natural history of oesophageal adenocarcinoma from tissue Raman mapping analysis.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With brain tumour incidence increasing, there is an urgent need for better diagnostic tools. Intraoperatively, brain tumours are diagnosed using a smear preparation reported by a neuropathologist. These have many limitations, including the time taken for the specimen to reach the pathology department and for results to be communicated to the surgeon. There is also a need to assist with resection rates and identifying infiltrative tumour edges intraoperatively to improve clearance. We present a novel study using a handheld Raman probe in conjunction with gold nanoparticles, to detect primary and metastatic brain tumours from fresh brain tissue sent for intraoperative smear diagnosis. Fresh brain tissue samples sent for intraoperative smear diagnosis were tested using the handheld Raman probe after application of gold nanoparticles. Derived Raman spectra were inputted into forward feature extraction algorithms to build a predictive model for sensitivity and specificity of outcome. These results demonstrate an ability to detect primary from metastatic tumours (especially for normal and low grade lesions), in which accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were respectively equal to 98.6%, 94.4% and 99.5% for normal brain tissue; 96.1%, 92.2% and 97.0% for low grade glial tumours; 90.3%, 89.7% and 90.6% for high grade glial tumours; 94.8%, 63.9% and 97.1% for meningiomas; 95.4%, 79.2% and 98.8% for metastases; and 99.6%, 88.9% and 100% for lymphoma, based on smear samples (κ = 0.87). Similar results were observed when compared to the final formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue diagnosis (κ = 0.85). Overall, our results have demonstrated the ability of Raman spectroscopy to match results provided by intraoperative smear diagnosis and raise the possibility of use intraoperatively to aid surgeons by providing faster diagnosis. Moving this technology into theatre will allow it to develop further and thus reach its potential in the clinical arena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.