Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30934940›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019

Quality of Childbirth Care in Women undergoing Labour: Satisfaction with Care Received and How It Changes over Time.

Miriam Donate-Manzanares, Teresa Rodríguez-Cano, Juan Gómez-Salgado, Julián Rodríguez-Almagro, Antonio Hernández-Martínez, Ester Barrilero-Fernández, Luis Beato-Fernández

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Childbirth Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Hospital in Southwestern Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Miriam Donate-ManzanaresVirgen de la Salud Hospital, 45004 Toledo, Spain. m_donate_manzanares@hotmail.com.
Teresa Rodríguez-CanoDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital General Universitario, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain. trcano@gmail.com.
Juan Gómez-SalgadoDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain. salgado@uhu.es.ORCID 0000-0001-9053-7730
Julián Rodríguez-AlmagroDepartment of Nursing of University of Castilla la Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain. julianj.rodriguez@uclm.es.ORCID 0000-0002-6239-2842
Antonio Hernández-MartínezMancha-Centro Hospital, Alcázar de San Juan, 13600 Ciudad Real, Spain. antomatron@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9100-1134
Ester Barrilero-FernándezHospital General Universitario, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain. ester.barrilero@hotmail.com.
Luis Beato-FernándezDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital General Universitario, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain. lbeatof@gmail.com.
Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real · ESHospital Virgen de la Salud · ESUniversidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo · ECUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: To evaluate women's satisfaction with the care received during childbirth undergoing labour and how this changes over time. (2) Methods: An observational, multicentre and longitudinal study in two public hospitals of Spain with a convenience sample of 248 women during the post-partum period. Satisfaction was evaluated using the Intrapartal-Specific Quality from the Patient's Perspective questionnaire. Socio-demographic and clinical variables were considered. A bivariate analysis evaluated the relationship between satisfaction and the recorded variables to compare the hypotheses, and also to know if there were any significant differences between the scores obtained at the various evaluated time points (three days, 15 days, one year postpartum). The multivariate analysis by binary logistic regression helped complete the study about the variables related to the level of satisfaction; (3) Results: The mean scores for satisfaction at each time point were high, and they lowered with time. The bivariate analysis showed an association between satisfaction and the following variables: 'mother's place of birth', 'level of education', 'type of labour onset', 'type of birth' and 'type of perineal trauma'. For the multivariate analysis, women who gave birth vaginally, began labour spontaneously and had an epidural were more satisfied than those who did not; (4) Conclusions: Women seemed to obtain good levels of satisfaction with the care they received. Even so, based on continuously improved quality, we proposed some improvement measures, particularly regarding the physical environment and the information offered to patients. It is important to know at what time experience while giving birth should be evaluated as scores can lower with time as part of its normal evolution.

Indexed as

childbirthobservational studypatient satisfactionquality improvementsurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30934940
PMCPMC6518019
OpenAlexW2933589908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.