Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30934886›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2019

Challenging the Myth of Non-Response to the Ergogenic Effects of Caffeine Ingestion on Exercise Performance.

Juan Del Coso, Beatriz Lara, Carlos Ruiz-Moreno, Juan José Salinero

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Can 3 mg·kgNutrients · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects ofGenes · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan Del CosoExercise Physiology Laboratory, Camilo José Cela University, 28692 Madrid, Spain. jdelcoso@ucjc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5785-984X
Beatriz LaraExercise Physiology Laboratory, Camilo José Cela University, 28692 Madrid, Spain. blara@ucjc.edu.
Carlos Ruiz-MorenoExercise Physiology Laboratory, Camilo José Cela University, 28692 Madrid, Spain. cruizm@ucjc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0644-8132
Juan José SalineroExercise Physiology Laboratory, Camilo José Cela University, 28692 Madrid, Spain. jjsalinero@ucjc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4153-5100
Camilo José Cela University · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ergogenicity of caffeine on several exercise and sport situations is well-established. However, the extent of the ergogenic response to acute caffeine ingestion might greatly vary among individuals despite using the same dosage and timing. The existence of one or several individuals that obtained minimal ergogenic effects or even slightly ergolytic effects after caffeine intake (i.e., non-responders) has been reported in several previous investigations. Nevertheless, the concept non-responding to caffeine, in terms of physical performance, relies on investigations based on the measurement of one performance variable obtained once. Recently it has been suggested that correct identification of the individual ergogenic effect induced by caffeine intake requires the repeated measurement of physical performance in identical caffeine⁻placebo comparisons. In this communication, we present data from an investigation where the ergogenic effect of acute caffeine intake (3 mg/kg) was measured eight times over a placebo in the same individuals and under the same conditions by an incremental cycling test to volitional fatigue and an adapted version of the Wingate cycling test. The ergogenic response to caffeine varied from 9% to 1% among individuals, but all participants increased both cycling power in the incremental test and Wingate mean power at least three to eight times out of eight the caffeine⁻placebo comparisons. These data expand the suggestion of a minimal occurrence of caffeine non-responders because it shows that all individuals responded to caffeine when caffeine is compared to a placebo on multiple and repeated testing sessions.

Indexed as

AdultCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsCross-Over StudiesFatigueHumansPhysical EndurancePhysical ExertionCaffeineCentral Nervous System Stimulantsergogenic aidsexercise performanceindividual responsesresponders

Identifiers

PMID30934886
PMCPMC6521624
OpenAlexW2934977007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.