Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30934746›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Bioactivity of Bioceramic Materials Used in the Dentin-Pulp Complex Therapy: A Systematic Review.

José Luis Sanz, Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Lozano, Carmen Llena, Salvatore Sauro, Leopoldo Forner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A novel fluffy PLGA/HA composite scaffold for bone defect repair.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Interaction of Ceramic Implant Materials with Immune System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Role of Biomaterials and Biocompatible Materials in Implant-Supported Dental Prosthesis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Biomimetic Aspects of Restorative Dentistry Biomaterials.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

José Luis SanzDepartment of Stomatology, Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain. Jsanzalex96@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5438-8085
Francisco Javier Rodríguez-LozanoCellular Therapy and Hematopoietic Transplant Unit, Hematology Department, Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinical University Hospital, IMIB, University of Murcia, 30120 Murcia, Spain. odontologofran@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0623-740X
Carmen LlenaDepartment of Stomatology, Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain. llena@uv.es.ORCID 0000-0002-3942-2820
Salvatore SauroDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad CEU-Cardenal Herrera, 46115 Alfara del Patriarca (Valencia), Spain. salvatore.sauro@uch.ceu.es.ORCID 0000-0002-2527-8776
Leopoldo FornerDepartment of Stomatology, Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain. forner@uv.es.ORCID 0000-0002-8603-9883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dentistry-applied bioceramic materials are ceramic materials that are categorized as bioinert, bioactive and biodegradable. They share a common characteristic of being specifically designed to fulfil their function; they are able to act as root canal sealers, cements, root repair or filling materials. Bioactivity is only attributed to those materials which are capable of inducing a desired tissue response from the host. The aim of this study is to present a systematic review of available literature investigating bioactivity of dentistry-applied bioceramic materials towards dental pulp stem cells, including a bibliometric analysis of such a group of studies and a presentation of the parameters used to assess bioactivity, materials studied and a summary of results. The research question, based on the PICO model, aimed to assess the current knowledge on dentistry-based bioceramic materials by exploring to what extent they express bioactive properties in in vitro assays and animal studies when exposed to dental pulp stem cells, as opposed to a control or compared to different bioceramic material compositions, for their use in the dentin-pulp complex therapy. A systematic search of the literature was performed in six databases, followed by article selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Studies assessing bioactivity of one or more bioceramic materials (both commercially available or novel/experimental) towards dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) were included in our review. A total of 37 articles were included in our qualitative review. Quantification of osteogenic, odontogenic and angiogenic markers using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the prevailing method used to evaluate bioceramic material bioactivity towards DPSCs in the current investigative state, followed by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) enzyme activity assays and Alizarin Red Staining (ARS) to assess mineralization potential. Mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine are the prevalent reference materials used to compare with newly introduced bioceramic materials. Available literature compares a wide range of bioceramic materials for bioactivity, consisting mostly of in vitro assays. The desirability of this property added to the rapid introduction of new material compositions makes this subject a clear candidate for future research.

Indexed as

bioactivitybioceramic materialsdental pulp stem cellssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30934746
PMCPMC6479584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.